Research Perspectives on Performance Evaluation and Project Management

Revista de Gestão e Secretariado

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Research Perspectives on Performance Evaluation and Project Management
Perspectivas de Pesquisa sobre Avaliação de Desempenho e Gerenciamento de Projetos
 
Creator Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira
de Oliveira, Lisanda Valim
Bernardes, Mayara Lucia
Calvetti, Ewerton Sacco
 
Subject Performance evaluation; Systemic analysis; Constructivism; Project management; Proknow-C
Avaliação de desempenho; Análise sistêmica; Construtivismo; Gerenciamento de Projetos; Proknow-C
 
Description This work has the objective of identifying research opportunities on the themes of performance evaluation and project management. In order to achieve this goal, the methodology described in ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process - Constructivist) was used, which allowed the formation of a bibliographic portfolio of 17 relevant articles on the subjects chosen, quantitatively demonstrating which are the most prominent, as well as their authors and periodicals, in addition to performing systemic analysis in this material to identify gaps on the subjects in the scientific environment and, thus, to instigate the accomplishment of new work. The systemic revision process was carried out using criteria derived from the constructivist worldview adopted by the researchers. The main results guide researchers in research opportunities where context uniqueness and limited rationality are taken into account when evaluating projects, as opposed to universal success criteria in project management.
Este trabalho tem o objetivo de identificar oportunidades de pesquisa sobre as temáticas de avaliação de desempenho e gerenciamento de projetos. Para isso, foi utilizada a metodologia descrita no processo ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist), que permitiu formar um portfólio bibliográfico de 17 artigos relevantes sobre os assuntos escolhidos, demonstrar quantitativamente quais são os de maior destaque, bem como seus autores e periódicos, além de realizar análise sistêmica nesse material para identificar lacunas sobre os temas no meio científico e, assim, instigar a realização de novos trabalhos. O processo de revisão sistêmica foi realizado a partir de lentes (critérios) derivadas da visão de mundo construtivista adotada pelos pesquisadores. Os principais resultados orientam pesquisadores em oportunidades de pesquisa em que a singularidade do contexto e a racionalidade limitada seja levada em conta quando da avaliação de projetos, em contraponto com critérios universais de sucesso em gestão de projetos.
 
Publisher Sindicato das Secretárias e Secretários do Estado de São Paulo (SINSESP)
 
Contributor

 
Date 2018-08-16
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://www.revistagesec.org.br/secretariado/article/view/680
10.7769/gesec.v9i2.680
 
Source Revista de Gestão e Secretariado; v. 9, n. 2 (2018): Maio-Agosto; 96-125
2178-9010
 
Language por
 
Relation https://www.revistagesec.org.br/secretariado/article/view/680/pdf
/*ref*/Andersen, E. S.; Birchall, D.; Jessen, S. A.; & Money, A. H. (2006). Exploring project success. Baltic Journal of Management, 1(2), 127-147.
/*ref*/Andersen, E. S. (2008). Rethinking project management: an organisational perspective. Strategic Direction, 26(3).
/*ref*/Ahmad, S. B.; Svalestuen, F.; Andersen, B.; & Torp, O. (2016). A review of performance measurement for successful concurrent construction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 447-454.
/*ref*/Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342.
/*ref*/Barclay, C. (2008). Towards an integrated measurement of IS project performance: The project performance scorecard. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 331-345.
/*ref*/Barclay, C. & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2010). Project performance development framework: An approach for developing performance criteria & measures for information systems (IS) projects. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 272-292.
/*ref*/Barney, J.; Wright, M.; Ketchen J.; & David J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625-641.
/*ref*/Barzilai, J. (2001). On the foundations of measurement. In: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2001. pp. 401-406.
/*ref*/Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
/*ref*/Blindenbach-Driessen, F.; Van Dalen, J.; & Van Den Ende, J. (2010). Subjective performance assessment of innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 572-592.
/*ref*/Bryde, D. J. (2003). Modelling project management performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(2), 229-254.
/*ref*/Cao, Q. & Hoffman, J. J. (2011). A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 155-164.
/*ref*/Cervo, A. L.; Bervian, P. A.; Silva, R. da (2007). Metodologia científica (6a ed.). São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall.
/*ref*/Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
/*ref*/Cooper, R.G. (2007). Managing technology development projects. IEEE Engineering International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, p. 400.
/*ref*/Dienstmann, J. S.; Lacerda, R. T. D. O.; Ensslin, L.; & Ensslin, S. R. (2014). Gestão da inovação e avaliação de desempenho: processo estruturado de revisão da literatura. Revista Produção Online, 14(1), 2-30.
/*ref*/Dweiri, F. & Kablan, M. (2006). Using fuzzy decision making for the evaluation of the project management internal efficiency. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 712-726.
/*ref*/Elsevier Scopus. 2015 (24), jun. 2015. p. Content.
/*ref*/Ensslin, L.; Ensslin, S. R.; Lacerda, R. T. D. O.; & Tasca, J. E. (2010). ProKnow-C, knowledge development process-constructivist. Processo técnico com patente de registro pendente junto ao INPI. Brasil.
/*ref*/Ensslin, S. R.; Ensslin, L.; Lacerda, R. T. D. O.; & Santos Matos, L. dos (2013). Evidenciação do estado da arte do tema avaliação do desempenho na regulação de serviços públicos segundo a percepção dos pesquisadores. Gestão Pública: Práticas e Desafios, 4(1).
/*ref*/Ensslin, L ; Back, F. T. E. E. ; Ensslin, S. R.; & Lacerda, R. T. O. (2013). Improved decision aiding in human resource management: a case using constructivist multi-criteria decision aiding. The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62, 735-757.
/*ref*/Ferreira, A. G. G. C. (2012). Bibliometria na avaliação de periódicos científicos-Bibliometrics in the evaluation of scientific journals. Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação e Biblioteconomia, 5(2).
/*ref*/Gil, A. C. (1999). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas, vol. 5.
/*ref*/Google (2015). Google Scholar. 2015 (24), jun. 2015. p. About.
/*ref*/Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (2001). The essential brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications. Oxford University Press.
/*ref*/Jha, K. N. & Iyer, K. C. (2007). Commitment, coordination, competence and the iron triangle. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 527-540.
/*ref*/Jugdev, K.; Thomas, J.; & Delisle, C.L. (2001). Rethinking project management: old truths and new insights. Project Management Forum, 7, 36-43.
/*ref*/Jugdev, K. & Muller, R. (2006). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach. R&D Management, 32.
/*ref*/Karlsen, J. T.; Andersen, J.; Birkely, L. S.; & Odegard, E. (2005). What characterizes successful it projects. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4(4), 525-540.
/*ref*/Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press.
/*ref*/Kennerley, M.; & Neely, A. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1222-1245.
/*ref*/Klijn, E. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10, 505-525.
/*ref*/Knoff, L. C.; Lacerda, R. T. D. O.; Ensslin, L.; & Ensslin, S. (2014). Mapeamento de publicações científicas sobre estratégia de manufatura: uma abordagem baseada em processos. Revista Produção Online, 14(2), 403-429.
/*ref*/Lacerda, R. T. O.; Ensslin, L.; & Ensslin, S. R. (2011a). Contribuições à gestão estratégica de organizações quando analisados na visão de seu desempenho. Gestão.Org-Revista Eletrônica de Gestão Organizacional, 9(2).
/*ref*/_____. (2011b). A performance measurement view of IT project management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(2), 132-151.
/*ref*/_____. (2012). Uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre estratégia e avaliação de desempenho. Gestão & Produção, 19(1).
/*ref*/_____. (2014). Research opportunities in strategic management field: a performance measurement approach. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 15(2), 158-174.
/*ref*/Lacerda, R. T. O; Ensslin, L.; Ensslin, S. R.; Knoff, L; & Martins, C. J. D. (2016). Research opportunities in business process management and performance measurement from a constructivist view. Knowledge and Process Management, 23, 18-30.
/*ref*/Lacerda, R. T. O.; Klein, B.; Fulco, J.; Santos, G.; & Bittarello, K. (2017). Integração inovadora entre empresas incubadas e universidades para geração contínua de vantagens competitivas em ambientes dinâmicos. Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, 7(2), 78-96.
/*ref*/Lenfle, S. & Loch, C. (2010). Lost roots: how project management came to emphasize control over flexibility and novelty. California. Management, 53, 32-55.
/*ref*/Ling, F. Y. Y.; Low, S. P.; Wang, S. Q.; & Lim, H. H. (2009). Key project management practices affecting Singaporean firms’ project performance in China. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), 59-71.
/*ref*/Lipovetsky, S.; Tishler, A.; Dvir, D.; & Shenhar, A. (1997). The relative importance of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 36, 19-31.
/*ref*/Lowe, K. B. & Gardner, W. L. (2001). Ten years of the leadership quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future. The Leadership Quarterly,11, 459-514.
/*ref*/Marafon, A. D.; Ensslin, L.; Ensslin, S. R.; & Lacerda, R. T. (2012). Revisão sistêmica da literatura sobre avaliação de desempenho na gestão de P&D. Revista Gestão Industrial, 8(3).
/*ref*/_____. (2015). The effectiveness of multi-criteria decision aid methodology: A case study of R&D management. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 86-109.
/*ref*/Marques, G.; Gourc, D.; & Lauras, M. (2011). Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1057-1069.
/*ref*/Melão, N.; & Pidd, M. (2000). A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling. Information Systems Journal, 10(2), 105-129.
/*ref*/Mir, F. A. & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202-217.
/*ref*/Mota, C. M. D. M.; Almeida, A. T. de; & Alencar, L. H. (2009). A multiple criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 175-181.
/*ref*/Ngacho, C.; & Das, D. (2015). A performance evaluation framework of construction projects: insights from literature. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 7(2), 151-173.
/*ref*/Nassar, N. & Abourizk, S. (2014). Practical application for integrated performance measurement of construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(6).
/*ref*/Oliveira, L. V.; Lacerda, R, T. O.; Fiates, G. G. S. & Ensslin, S. R. (2016). Avaliação de desempenho e gerenciamento de projetos: uma análise bibliométrica. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, [s.l.], 7(1), 95-113.
/*ref*/Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research. Scand. J. Manag, 11, 319-333.
/*ref*/Paiva Júnior, F. G. de; Souza Leão, A. L. M. de; & Mello, S. C. B. de. (2011). Validade e confiabilidade na pesquisa qualitativa em Administração. Ciências da Administração, 13(31), 190-209.
/*ref*/Pollack, J. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 266-74.
/*ref*/Qureshi, T. M.; Warraich, A. S. & Hijazi, S. T. (2009). Significance of project management performance assessment (PMPA) model. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 378-388.
/*ref*/Rosacker, K. M. & Olson, D. L. (2008). An empirical assessment of it project selection and evaluation methods in state government. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 49-58.
/*ref*/Roy, B. (1993). Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, 66(2), 184-203.
/*ref*/Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
/*ref*/Silva da Rosa, F.; Rolim Ensslin, S.; Ensslin, L. & João Lunkes, R. (2012). Environmental disclosure management: a constructivist case. Management Decision, 50(6), 1117-1136.
/*ref*/Shenhar, A. & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Harvard Business Press, Boston.
/*ref*/Shenhar, A.J.; Tishler, A.; Dvir, D.; Lipovetsky, S. & Lechler, T. (2002). Refining the search for success dimensions. R&D Management, 27, 97-106.
/*ref*/Svejvig, P. & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278-290.
/*ref*/Taticchi, P.; Tonelli, F., & Cagnazzo, L. (2010). Performance measurement and management: a literature review and a research agenda. Measuring Business Excellence, 14, 4-18.
/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
/*ref*/Thomas, G. & Fernández, W. (2008). Success in IT projects: A matter of definition? International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 733-742.
/*ref*/Tranfield, D. R.; Denyer, D. & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222.
/*ref*/Tukel, O.I. & Rom, W.O. (2001). An empirical investigation of project evaluation criteria.
/*ref*/Xu, Y. & Yeh, C. H. (2014). A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 218-228.
/*ref*/Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171-174.
/*ref*/Willems, L. L.; & Vanhoucke, M. (2015). Classification of articles and journals on project control and earned value management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1610-1634.
/*ref*/Williams, T. (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 497-508.
/*ref*/Winter, M.; Smith, C.; Morris, P.; & Cicmil, S. (2006). Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 638-649.
 
Rights Direitos autorais 2018 Rogério Tadeu de Oliveira Lacerda, Lisanda Valim de Oliveira, Mayara Lucia Bernardes, Ewerton Sacco Calvetti
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library