The Efficacy of Monoplant® and Indoplant® as Contraceptive Methods: A Comparative Study

Wikrama Parahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The Efficacy of Monoplant® and Indoplant® as Contraceptive Methods: A Comparative Study
 
Creator Gunardi, Eka R
Ballo, Frista
 
Description Objective: To determine the effectiveness, safety, and time of insertion between Monoplant® with Indoplant® to prevent pregnancy.
Methods: Data were collected from November 2015 until May 2016 in Raden Saleh Clinic. A total of 153 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study and were divided into 77 patients who received Monoplant® and 76 patients received Indoplant®. The study period was 6 months.
Results: The data obtained showed no significant difference in the effectiveness of both contraceptive methods. In addition, side effects such as menstrual disorders and weight gain did not differ significantly in those study groups. However, the time of insertion between Monoplant® and Indoplant® was siginificantly different (162.91 + 197.04 + 49.81 seconds versus 44.96 seconds, p<0.001). For complications such as skin irritation, inflammation, there are no differences
between Monoplant® (0.0%) and Indoplant® users (0.0%).
Conclusion: There are no significant differences in efficacy and side effects using Monoplant® and Indoplant® during the 6-month follow-up. However, the insertion time of Monoplant® is shorter compared to Indoplant®’s. Monoplant® can be considered for use as contraception with the effectiveness and side effects are almost the same, but with shorter time of insertion compared to Indoplant ®.
[Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 5-2: 94-98]
Keywords: contraception, implant, indoplant®, monoplant®
 
Publisher Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology
 
Date 2017-10-31
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://inajog.com/index.php/journal/article/view/526
10.32771/inajog.v5i2.526
 
Source Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017; 94-98
2338-7335
2338-6401
10.32771/inajog.v5i2
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://inajog.com/index.php/journal/article/view/526/454
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library