HESITATIF SEBAGAI PELENGKAP JENIS TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI MENURUT SEARLE

DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title HESITATIF SEBAGAI PELENGKAP JENIS TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI MENURUT SEARLE
 
Creator Setyanta, Yustinus Budi
 
Subject Discourse Analysis
Utterance; Speech Acts; Academic Interaction; BIPA Teachers
 
Description The goal of this study is expressing teacher’s speech acts in academic interaction at Indonesian class in Wisma Bahasa Yogyakarta. This study used qualitative approach in pragmatics aspect. The data collection that used in this study is nonparticipative observation with record and written technic. In this method two research subjects that have specific characteristic is used. The data research focused on the teacher’s speech acts in Wisma Bahasa Yogyakarta who teach Indonesian in natural speech. In line with the research goal, the result of this study show that the kinds of speech acts is devided into six categories, those are (a) assertive speech acts, (b) hesitative speech acts, (c) directive speech acts, (d) expressive speech acts, (e) comissive speech acts, and (f) declarative speech acts. Assertive speech acts is marked with the using of proposition which indicate of speaker conviction in his utterance. Hesitative speech acts is marked with the using of proposition which indicate the speaker unbelieveable in his utterance. Directive speech acts is classified into two terms, those are to express believeable and also unbelieveable proposition in his utterance can do by the speaker. Expressive speech acts is classified into two terms, those are to express evaluation, directly or indirectly. Comissive speech act is classified into two terms, those are to express that the listener has believeable and also unbelieveable to do what is said in his utterance. Declarative speech acts is classified into three terms, those are to express that the speaker give permission, forbiden, and give limitation. Hesitative speech act in this study have not been embodied in the classification of types of speech according to Searle, whereas hesitatif speech act is not something impossible in a speech. Sometimes speaker not have conviction of truth utterance.Keywords: Utterance, Speech Acts, Academic Interaction, BIPA Teachers
 
Publisher Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Lakidende Unaaha
 
Contributor
 
Date 2015-06-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://journal.fkip-unilaki.ac.id/index.php/dia/article/view/6
 
Source DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika; Vol 1, No 1 (2015): DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika; 56-70
2443-003X
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://journal.fkip-unilaki.ac.id/index.php/dia/article/view/6/5
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Yustinus Budi Setyanta
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library