International Health Regulation Perspective On Covid-19 Mitigation Policy: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia And South Korea

Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title International Health Regulation Perspective On Covid-19 Mitigation Policy: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia And South Korea
Perspektif Regulasi Kesehatan Internasional dalam Kebijakan Mitigasi Covid-19: Studi Komparatif Antara Indonesia dengan Korea Selatan
 
Creator Jonathan, Raymond
Sitha Dewi, Desak Ayu Gangga
 
Subject COVID-19
International Law
International Health Regulation 2005
COVID-19
Hukum Internasional
Regulasi Kesehatan Internasional 2005
 
Description COVID-19 has caused a multidimensional crisis in a global society. Many mitigation policies were made to handle the crisis, especially in South Korea and Indonesia. South Korea’s policies were judged to be effective as the success increased public opinion and participation. As a result, the COVID-19 case’s curve flattened rapidly because of responsive policies and based on international law. Meanwhile, Indonesia continues to show an increase in the case curve because of inconsistent policies and weak law instruments towards emergency health response. As a result, the crisis has more long-term effects and gets worse. It can be concluded that South Korea has more responsive policies and follows more of the International Health Regulation of 2005 compared to Indonesia.
COVID-19 telah memicu krisis multidimensional di masyarakat global. Berbagai kebijakan mitigasi dihasilkan untuk menangani krisis tersebut, terutama di Korea Selatan dan Indonesia. Kebijakan Korea Selatan dinilai efektif sehingga berhasil meningkatkan kepercayaan dan partisipasi publik. Sebagai hasilnya, kurva kasus COVID-19 menurun dengan cepat akibat kebijakan yang responsif dan peka dengan perkembangan Hukum Internasional. Sementara itu, Indonesia terus menunjukkan peningkatan kurva COVID-19 karena kebijakan yang inkonsisten dan lemahnya instrumen hukum terhadap penanganan darurat kesehatan. Akibatnya, krisis berdampak berkepanjangan dan semakin parah. Dapat disimpulkan Korea Selatan memiliki kebijakan yang lebih responsif dan banyak mengacu pada Regulasi Kesehatan Internasional 2005 daripada Indonesia.
 
Publisher CV Rewang Rencang
 
Date 2021-10-24
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/129
 
Source Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis; Vol. 2 No. 10 (2021): Health Law; 961-979
2746-4075
 
Language ind
 
Relation https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/129/65
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library