JUDICIAL PREVIEW MODEL IN THE BUDGET FUNCTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY

DIH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title JUDICIAL PREVIEW MODEL IN THE BUDGET FUNCTION OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
 
Creator Anggita Ramadhan, Diastama
 
Subject budgeting process; judicial preview; legislation
 
Description AbstrakPenelitian ini mengusulkan model Judicial Preview yang dapat berfungsi untuk mengurangi perilaku koruptif dalam hal fungsi anggaran yang dilakukan lembaga legislatif. Perilaku koruptif sering terjadi dalam fungsi anggaran yang dilakukan oleh anggota legislatif sendiri, hal ini menjadi cerminan rendahnya kualitas lembaga legislatif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif, dengan menggunakan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deduktif sebagai metode analisisnya, serta menggunakan bahan hukum yang dikumpulkan melalui metode studi kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian menawarkan cabang kekuasaan yudikatif untuk dapat melakukan konsep judicial preview tanpa perlu mengurangi independesi yang dimiliki lembaga tersebut, sehingga lembaga yudikatif tidak akan ikut serta dalam political arena secara praktis. Organ yudikatif ini hanya berfungsi untuk melakukan tindakan hukum pada fase pencegahan sehingga permasalahan tidak kembali terjadi.Kata kunci: judicial preview; legislasi; penyusunan anggaranAbstractThis research proposes a Judicial Preview model that aims to reduce corrupt behaviour in terms of the budget function performed by the parliament. Corruption behaviour often occurs in the budget function performed by members of the parliament is a reflection of the low quality of the legislature. This research is normative research, using the statute approach and conceptual approach. This research uses the deductive method as the method of analysis, as well as using legal material collected through the literature study method. The results of this research are that the judicial branch of power can conduct the judicial preview model without reducing the independence of the institution so that the judiciary will not practically involved in the political arena. This judicial organ only functions to take legal action in the prevention phase so that problems do not re-occur.
 
Publisher Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
 
Contributor
 
Date 2021-07-07
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dih/article/view/4818
10.30996/dih.v17i2.4818
 
Source DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Volume 17 Nomor 2 Agustus 2021; 128 - 140
2654-525X
0216-6534
10.30996/dih.v17i2
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dih/article/view/4818/pdf
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library