Fiscal Decentralization, Accountability and Corruption Indication: Evidence from Indonesia

Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance

View Publication Info
Field Value
Title Fiscal Decentralization, Accountability and Corruption Indication: Evidence from Indonesia
Creator Saputra, Newin Ananta Aji
Setiawan, Doddy
Subject Indications of Corruption
Fiscal Decentralization
regional losses
revenue deficiency
Description In the Corruption Perception Index 2019, Indonesia ranks 90th among 180 countries (Transparency International, 2020). Indonesia still among the lowest rank in the corruption index. This index shows that corruption is an important issue for Indonesia. Therefore, the study aims at examining the determinants of corruption in Indonesia. This study focuses on two important aspects: fiscal decentralization and accountability. Since the enactment of Law Number 22 of 1999, which was then revised by Law Number 32 of 2004, the local government can manage fiscal. It is expected that local governments can use resources for the improvement of the wealth of the citizens. Further, the local government has a responsibility for using the resources.  However, there are cases regarding corruption in local government in Indonesia. This study uses secondary data from local government financial statements to search the corruption indication, level of fiscal decentralization, and accountability. The study’s sample consists of 94 districts/cities on Java during the 2013-2015 period. The dependent variable in this study is an indication of corruption. Furthermore, the study divided corruption into three aspects: regional losses, potential regional losses, and revenue deficiency. The independent variables in this study were fiscal decentralization and accountability. This study uses multiple linear regression models to test the effect of fiscal decentralization and accountability on Indonesia’s corruption indicator. The result of the study shows that fiscal decentralization has a negative impact on corruption indication. The higher degree of fiscal decentralization minimizes the corruption indication in Java island. Meanwhile, fiscal decentralization has a negative effect on regional losses and revenue deficiency. Accountability has no significant on corruption indication. However, accountability has a negative impact on regional losses. In conclusion, both fiscal decentralization and accountability have curb corruption indication in the regional losses aspect.
Publisher Research and Development Agency Ministry of Home Affairs
Date 2021-04-30
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Format application/pdf
Source Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021); 29-40
Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance; Vol 13 No 1 (2021); 29-40
Language eng
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Author(s)

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us


Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library