PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA KONTRAK DAN OUTSOURCING, SERTA PROBLEMATIKA IMPLEMENTASINYA

Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA KONTRAK DAN OUTSOURCING, SERTA PROBLEMATIKA IMPLEMENTASINYA
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA KONTRAK DAN OUTSOURCING, SERTA PROBLEMATIKA IMPLEMENTASINYA
 
Creator Budiyono, Tri
 
Description Hubungan pengusaha dan buruh cenderung diwarnai ketegangan yang bersifat tolak-tarik. Pengusaha memelihara kontinuitas usaha untuk mendapat keuntungan yang optimal, sementara buruh berusaha untuk mendapat upah atau kesejahteraan yang layak. Bentuk perjuangan buruh dilakukan melalui jalur konstitusional, dengan mengajukan judicial review terhadap UU No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Dengan pendekatan konseptual dan filosofis terhadap bahan hukum putusan MK yang relevan dengan pokok kajian, penelitian ini mengkaji perjuangan buruh untuk mendapat jaminan legal yang lebih berkepastian hukum. Temuan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah: (a) konstatasi hukum “demi hukum” yang seharusnya mampu memberi perlindungan hukum yang kuat, masih menimbulkan multi tafsir yang berujung hilangnya perlindungan hukum yang berkepastian. (b) Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusannya, telah meletakkan dasar legalitas yang lebih berkepastian hukum melalui implementasi norma perlindungan buruh secara berjenjang. (c) putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sekalipun memberi kepastian hukum pada aras normatif, namun masih menyisakan ketidakpastian perlindungan hukum pada aras empirik.
The relationship between employers and workers tends to be characterized by a tension between the employers' and workers' interests. While the employers maintain business continuity to obtain optimal advantages, the workers demand to get decent wages or welfare. For example, the laborers have struggled through a constitutional way by submitting a judicial review of Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. This research used a conceptual approach and a philosophical approach to observe the relevant legal material in the Constitutional Court's decision to obtain legal guarantees with more legal certainty. In conclusion, this research found that: (a) The phrase 'for the sake of the law' should have granted the laborers more legal protection. However, it still creates multiple interpretations that lead to the loss of certain legal protections. (b) The Constitutional Court, through its decision, has laid the basis of legality with more legal certainty through the implementation of labor protection norms gradually. (c) Even though the Constitutional Court's decision has already provided legal certainty normatively, the uncertainty of legal protection still exists in practices.
 
Publisher Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
 
Date 2021-04-29
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum/article/view/3982
10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p145-160
 
Source Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; 145-160
2541-5417
2541-4984
10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2
 
Language ind
 
Relation https://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum/article/view/3982/1750
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library