Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Three Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems

Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Three Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems
 
Creator Kapse, Balaji Sopanrao
Nagmode, Pradnya S.
Vishwas, Jayshree Ramkrishna
Karpe, Hrishikesh B.
Basatwar, Harshal V.
Godge, Shubham P.
 
Subject Canal transportation
Centering ability
Computed tomography
HyFlex controlled memory
Revo-S, Mtwo
 
Description AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the canal transportation and centering ability of three rotary nickel-titanium file systems, HyFlex controlled memory, Revo-S, and Mtwo in moderately curved root canals using computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted single-rooted teeth having curved root canals with at least 10°–20° of curvature were selected. The teeth were divided into three experimental groups of ten each. After preparation with HyFlex CM (Coltene-Whaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland), Revo-S (Micro-Mega, Besançon, France), and Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany) all teeth were scanned using CT to determine the root canal shape. Pre- and post-instrumentation images were obtained at three levels, 3 mm apical, 9 mm middle, and 15 mm coronal above the apical foramen were compared using CT software. Amount of transportation and centering ability were assessed. The three groups were statistically compared with analysis of variance and post-hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
RESULTS: Least apical transportation and higher centering ability were seen in HyFlex CM file system in all the three sections followed by Revo-S, Mtwo file system showed maximum transportation.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the present in-vitro study, we can conclude that HyFlex CM rotary file systems showed least canal transportation and highest centering ability as compared to Revo-S and Mtwo file system but there was no statistically significant difference among these file systems (p > 0.05) at coronal, middle, and apical level of root canal.
 
Publisher Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
 
Date 2021-03-21
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://www.id-press.eu/mjms/article/view/5666
10.3889/oamjms.2021.5666
 
Source Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences; Vol. 9 No. D (2021): D - Dental Sciences; 30-36
1857-9655
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://www.id-press.eu/mjms/article/view/5666/5450
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Balaji Sopanrao Kapse, Pradnya S. Nagmode, Jayshree Ramkrishna Vishwas, Hrishikesh B. Karpe, Harshal V. Basatwar, Shubham P. Godge (Author)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library