Usage Evaluation of Supporting Applications For Quick Data Search (SuApQuDaS) Using the PIECES Framework

Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Usage Evaluation of Supporting Applications For Quick Data Search (SuApQuDaS) Using the PIECES Framework
Evaluasi Penggunaan Supporting Applications For Quick Data Search (SuApQuDaS) Dengan Metode PIECES Framework
 
Creator Maulana, Yana Iqbal
Salim, Agus
 
Description The SuApQuDaS application was built to meet the needs of a team in one of the bureaus in managing data, especially the data search process to improve service to customers. Evaluation is a planned activity to assess a problem that occurs using instruments and the results can be compared with benchmarks to obtain conclusions so that solutions can be found to solve problems that arise. Meanwhile, information system evaluation can be carried out in different ways and at different levels, depending on the purpose of the evaluation. Its purpose is to assess technical capabilities, operational implementation, and system utilization. To simplify the evaluation, an analysis method is offered with the PIECES framework which describes the 6 focus of weakness analysis, namely Performance, Information and Data, Economy, Control and Security, Efficiency and Service. Based on the analysis method of the PIECES framework in measuring the level of evaluation, the value of each domain is obtained, namely the performance domain gets a score of 4.09, the domain information and data gets a score of 4.18, the domain economics gets a score of 4.18, the domain control and security gets a score 4.11, domain efficiency gets a score of 4.17, and domain service gets a score of 4.13.
Aplikasi SuApQuDaS dibangun untuk memenuhi kebutuhan tim di salah satu biro dalam mengelola data khususnya proses pencarian data untuk meningkatkan pelayanan kepada customer. Evaluasi merupakan kegiatan terencana untuk menilai suatu permasalahan yang terjadi dengan menggunakan instrumen dan hasilnya dapat dibandingkan dengan tolak ukur untuk memperoleh kesimpulan sehingga ditemukan solusi untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan yang timbul. Sedangkan Evaluasi sistem informasi dapat dilakukan dengan cara yang berbeda dan pada tingkatan yang berbeda, tergantung pada tujuan evaluasinya. Tujuannya adalah untuk menilai kemampuan teknis, pelaksanaan operasional, dan pendayagunaan sistem. Untuk mempermudah evaluasi, ditawarkan cara analisis dengan kerangka PIECES yang menguraikan ke dalam 6 fokus analisis kelemahan yaitu Performance, Information and Data, Economy, Control and Security, Eficiency dan Service. Berdasarkan metode analisis kerangka kerja PIECES dalam mengukur tingkat evaluasi didapatkan nilai dari masing- masing domain yaitu domain performance memperoleh skor 4,09, domain information and data memperoleh skor 4,18, domain economics memperoleh skor 4,18, domain control and security memperoleh skor 4,11, domain efficiency memperoleh skor 4,17, dan domain service memperoleh skor 4,13.
 
Publisher LP2M INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI DAN BISNIS ASIA MALANG
 
Date 2021-02-11
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://jurnal.stmikasia.ac.id/index.php/jitika/article/view/512
10.32815/jitika.v15i1.512
 
Source Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia; Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Volume 15 Nomor 1 (8); 13-18
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia; Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Volume 15 Nomor 1 (8); 13-18
2580-8397
0852-730X
10.32815/jitika.v15i1
 
Language ind
 
Relation http://jurnal.stmikasia.ac.id/index.php/jitika/article/view/512/282
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Yana Iqbal Maulana, Agus Salim
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library