Comparing Predictive Validity of Islamic Azad University English Proficiency Test and Standard Proficiency Tests against a Socio-Cognitively Validated Test of English for Specific Purpose

International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Comparing Predictive Validity of Islamic Azad University English Proficiency Test and Standard Proficiency Tests against a Socio-Cognitively Validated Test of English for Specific Purpose
 
Creator Motallebzadeh, Khalil
Khosravani, Mahmood
 
Description In spite of the facts that validity is known as a unified concept in contemporary theory and practice, investigating the sub-construct of this concept enlightens the discipline to a great extent. Predictive validity of high-stakes tests such as English proficiency tests (EPTs) which are used for critical educational decisions is an example. EPT of Islamic Azad University (IAU), as a localized form of national and international scale proficiency tests, is served as an obligatory part of exit program for PhD candidates. Considering the fact that manipulating ESP texts is a major language learning goal in the university, the current research was an attempt to examine the predictive validity of IAU-EPT against a valid third measure in comparison with other EPT exams. To this aim, adopting Weir’s socio-cognitive framework, an ESP test of politics was developed and validated. Then, the test was administered to 19 PhD candidates of politics with IAU-EPT certification and 16 PhD candidates certified at other EPTs (TOEFL, GRE, and Tolimo). Pearson correlation was employed to investigate the relationship between their authorized EPT scores and their performance in a real context validated ESP test. The findings revealed a weak predicting value for IAU-EPT in a ESP task while a strong and significant correlation was reported between standard EPTs scores and ESP test. Further investigation is required to investigate the construct validity of IAU-EPT. Future researchers are recommended to include more participants from other disciplines. These findings have implications for language learners, language teachers, researchers and educational policy makers.
 
Publisher  Al-Kindi Center for Research and Development
 
Date 2020-12-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt/article/view/845
10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.12.9
 
Source International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation; Vol. 3 No. 12 (2020): International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation; 68-72
2617-0299
2708-0099
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt/article/view/845/738
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library