What do we know about barriers to knowledge transfer? A bibliometric study on internal stickiness

JPBReview e-ISSN: 2525-3654

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title What do we know about barriers to knowledge transfer? A bibliometric study on internal stickiness
O que sabemos sobre as Barreiras à Transferência de Conhecimento? Um Estudo Bibliométrico sobre Internal Stickiness
 
Creator Araujo, Valdemilson de Assis Alves de
Scafuto, Isabel Cristina
 
Subject Internal Stickiness; Knowledge Transfer; Bibliometric review
Internal Stickiness; Transferência de Conhecimento; Bibliométrico
 
Description Objective of the study: to identify the intellectual structure of research on Internal Stickiness (IS) from the references existing in publications on this topic.Methodology / Approach: a bibliometric analysis of quotation and quotation was used, as well as a network analysis. The sample, after worked and free of articles that were not part of the theme, was composed of 152 articles from 1994 to 2018.Originality / Relevance: The transfer of knowledge and best practices among members of the organization has attracted considerations from academia and organizations, because the company's competitiveness is directly linked to the knowledge acquired and its sharing. The difficulty of transferring knowledge and best practices in organizations is represented by the term Internal Stickiness (IS).Main results: three fields were identified that guide research on (IS): Knowledge Transfer; Knowledge transfer as a positive factor for the organization; Knowledge Transfer and Strategic Innovation.Theoretical / methodological contributions: it was possible to identify that there was no review article on the topic (IS). So, this study was able to contribute with the theory and show the existing works that had a greater influence on (IS).Social / management contributions: it is noticed that the existing articles deal with (IS) as the difficulty of knowledge transfer. With this, this study can also contribute to the practice of knowledge transfer, mainly because this theme is related to the development of competitive advantage in companies.Keywords: Internal Stickiness; Knowledge Transfer; Bibliometric.
Objetivo do estudo: identificar a estrutura intelectual da pesquisa sobre (IS) a partir das referências existentes nas publicações sobre esse tema.Metodologia / Abordagem: foi usada uma análise bibliométrica de citação e cocitação, como também uma análise de rede. A amostra, após trabalhada e livre de artigos que não faziam parte do tema, foi composta por 152 artigos entre o ano de 1994 a 2018.Originalidade / Relevância: A transferência de conhecimento e melhores práticas entre os membros da organização têm atraído considerações da academia e das organizações, porque a competitividade da empresa está diretamente ligada ao conhecimento adquirido e seu compartilhamento. A dificuldade de transferir conhecimento e melhores práticas nas organizações é representada pelo termo Internal Stickiness (IS).Principais resultados: identificou-se três campos que direcionam as pesquisas sobre (IS): Transferência de Conhecimento; Transferência de Conhecimento como fator positivo para a organização; Transferência de Conhecimento e Inovação Estratégica. Contribuições teóricas / metodológicas: foi possível identificar que não tinha nenhum artigo de revisão sobre o tema (IS). Então, este estudo pôde contribuir com a teoria e mostrar os trabalhos existentes que tiveram uma maior influência sobre (IS).Contribuições sociais / para a gestão: percebe-se que os artigos existentes tratam de (IS) como a dificuldade de transferência de conhecimento. Com isto, este estudo pode contribuí também com a prática da transferência de conhecimento, principalmente, porque este tema está relacionado com o desenvolvimento da vantagem competitiva nas empresas.
 
Publisher Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
 
Contributor
Agradeço ao CAPES e FAP-Uninove (Universidade Nove de Julho).
 
Date 2021-01-03
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://openaccessojs.com/JBReview/article/view/212
10.26668/businessreview/2021.v6i1.212
 
Source International Journal of Professional Business Review; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Continuous publication - JANUARY/DECEMBER (EARLY VIEW); e212
International Journal of Professional Business Review; Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Continuous publication - JANUARY/DECEMBER (EARLY VIEW); e212
2525-3654
2525-3654
 
Language por
 
Relation http://openaccessojs.com/JBReview/article/view/212/pdf
/*ref*/Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621–636. doi: 10.1002/smj.532
/*ref*/Adler, P. S. (1990). Shared Learning. Management Science, 36(8), 938–957. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.36.8.938
/*ref*/Akbar, H. (2003). Knowledge Levels and their Transformation: Towards the Integration of Knowledge Creation and Individual Learning*. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1997–2021. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00409.x
/*ref*/Andrews, K. M., & Delahaye, B. L. (2000). Influences on Knowledge processes In Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 797–810. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00204
/*ref*/Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).
/*ref*/Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
/*ref*/Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424
/*ref*/Balm, G. J. (1992). Benchmarking: A Practitioner's Guide for Becoming and Staying Best of the Best.' QPMA Press, Schaumberg, IL.
/*ref*/Baloff, N. (1970). Startup management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-17(4), 132–141. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1970.6448538
/*ref*/Barney, J., (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17(1), 99-120.
/*ref*/Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press.
/*ref*/Berger, P. L. and T. Luckman (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
/*ref*/Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R. (1999). Knowledge Transfer In International Acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (3), 439-462.
/*ref*/Buttolph, D. (1992). A New Look at Adaptation. Knowledge, 13(4), 460–470. doi: 10.1177/107554709201300405
/*ref*/Chew, W. 8. (1991). 'Productivity, investment and Murphy's law', Harvard Business School, working paper, pp. 91-059.
/*ref*/Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. doi: 10.2307/2393553
/*ref*/Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 39–68. doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00004-3
/*ref*/Das, A., & Chakraborty, S. (2018). KNOWLEDGE WITHHOLDING WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL RESISTANCE TO KNOWLEDGE SHARING LINKING WITH TERRITORIALITY. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability. RISUS ISSN 2179-3565, 9, 94. doi: 10.24212/2179-3565.2018v9i3p94-108
/*ref*/Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts.
/*ref*/Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
/*ref*/Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532. doi: 10.2307/258557
/*ref*/Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. 28.
/*ref*/Galbraith, C. S. (1990). Transferring Core Manufacturing Technologies in High-Technology Firms. California Management Review, 32(4), 56–70. doi: 10.2307/41166628
/*ref*/Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23–30. doi: 10.1108/13673270210417664
/*ref*/Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17 109–122.
/*ref*/Guerrazzi, L. A. de C., Brandão, M. M., Junior, H. de C., & Lourenço, C. E. (2015). Pesquisa em Marketing e Estratégia nos Principais Periódicos Internacionais: Um Estudo Bibliométrico sobre Publicações no Século XXI. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 14(01), 07–27. doi: 10.5585/riae.v14i1.2200
/*ref*/Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496. Retrieved December 18, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094239
/*ref*/Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1) 82–111.
/*ref*/Hayes, R. H. and K. B. Clark (1985). Exploring the Sources of Productivity Differences at the Factory Level. Wiley, New York.
/*ref*/Jasimuddin, S. M. (2007). Exploring knowledge transfer mechanisms: The case of a UK-based group within a high-tech global corporation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(4), 294–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.03.003
/*ref*/Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 508–523. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107
/*ref*/Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
/*ref*/Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONALBUSINESS STUDIES, 24 (4), 625-645.
/*ref*/Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308. doi: 10.2307/259084
/*ref*/Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. 19:461-477.
/*ref*/Leonard-Barton, D. A., W. B. Chew, & R. Bohn. (1991). "Beating Murphy's Law." MIT Sloan Management Review 32, no. 3: 5–16.
/*ref*/Lin, T.-Y., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2010). EXPLORING THE KNOWLEDGE NETWORK OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCE RESEARCH: A CO-CITATION ANALYSIS. 8(2), 9.
/*ref*/Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418. doi: 10.2307/3003464
/*ref*/March, J. and H. Simon (1958). Organizations. Wiley, New York.
/*ref*/March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 71–87.
/*ref*/McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.
/*ref*/Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I, Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 586-59.
/*ref*/Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer: Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77–91. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171108
/*ref*/Nath, R., & Jackson, W. M. (1991). Productivity of management information systems researchers: Does Lotka’s law apply? Information Processing & Management, 27(2–3), 203–209. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(91)90049-R
/*ref*/Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
/*ref*/Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, pp. 14-37.
/*ref*/Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, UK.
/*ref*/Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.5.538.15204
/*ref*/Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management-1980-2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27(3), 185–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001
/*ref*/Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.
/*ref*/Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of theStrategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004. doi: 10.1002/smj.397
/*ref*/Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240. doi: 10.2307/3556658
/*ref*/Reed, R., & Defillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88. doi: 10.2307/258107
/*ref*/Rice, R. E. and E. M. Rogers (1980). 'Reinvention in the innovation process'. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), pp. 499-514.
/*ref*/Schuller, M. (2014). Stickiness in knowledge transfer. In H. Hasan (Eds.), Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research (pp. 61-63). Wollongong, Australia: THEORI. https://eurekaconnection.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/p-61-63-stickiness-in-knowledge-theory-theori-ebook_finaljan2014-v3.pdf
/*ref*/Serra, F., Ferreira, M., Guerrazzi, L., & Scaciotta, V. (2018). Doing Bibliometric Reviews for the Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management. Iberoamerican Journal Of Strategic Management (IJSM), 17(3), 01-16. doi:10.5585/riae.v17i3.2713.
/*ref*/Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988-2008): Intellectual Structure of Innovation Research (1988-2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 62–93. doi: 10.1002/smj.2002
/*ref*/Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595-623. Retrieved December 18, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094131
/*ref*/Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406
/*ref*/Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm: Exploring Internal Stickiness. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171105
/*ref*/Szulanski, G. (2000). The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
/*ref*/Szulanski, G. (2003). Sticky knowledge: Barriers to knowing in the firm. London: Sage.
/*ref*/Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, R. J. (2004). When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600–613. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0096
/*ref*/Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. J. (2016). Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty. Organization Science, 27(2), 304–322. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2016.1049
/*ref*/Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258. doi: 10.2307/20159032
/*ref*/Teece, D. J. (1977). Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How. The Economic Journal, 87(346), 242. doi: 10.2307/2232084
/*ref*/Tolbert, P. S. (1988). Institutional sources of organizational culture in major law firms [Electronic version]. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 101-113). Boston: Ballinger Press.
/*ref*/Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. doi: 10.2307/3069443
/*ref*/Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations. Organization Science, 5(1), 98–118. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.98
/*ref*/Urbizagástegui Alvarado, R. (2002). A Lei de Lotka na bibliometria brasileira. Ciência da Informação, 31(2), 14–20. doi: 10.1590/S0100-19652002000200002
/*ref*/Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2012). The Dynamic Capability View in Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Review: DCV in Strategic Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, n/a-n/a. doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12000
/*ref*/von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
/*ref*/Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
/*ref*/Winter, S. G., & Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as Strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084
/*ref*/Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review. 27 (2), 185-203.
/*ref*/Zaltman. G., R. Duncan and J. Holbek (1973). Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York.
/*ref*/Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1) 76–92.
/*ref*/Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Professional Business Review
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library