The ‘Head of Household’. A Long Normative History of a Statistical Category in the U.K.

Administory. Journal for the History of Public Administration

View Publication Info
Field Value
Title The ‘Head of Household’. A Long Normative History of a Statistical Category in the U.K.
Creator Brückweh, Kerstin; Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung
Subject Geschichte; Volkszählung; Verwaltung; Verwaltungsgeschichte; Wissensgeschichte; Geschlechtergeschichte;
Geschichte; Verwaltung; Verwaltungsgeschichte; History; Administration; History of Administration; Staat; Gender; Social Studies; Sozialgeschichte;
Description The household forms an important category in social science research. It is used to collect data, to classify it and to represent the results. However, what seems to be a simple listing of facts becomes less clear when a basic question is raised: What is a household? Is it a family living under one roof? Is a roof limited to a house, or does a flat already constitute a household? Do members of a household have to be officially related, meaning married, adopted etc., or even related by blood? And how do households and definitions of households differ over time and space? Some definitions like the United Nations’s dwelling concept, for example, sound pragmatic with little regard to the social relationships of the actual human beings living in a household. However, there are indeed power relations within a household (e.g. between parents and children). Social scientists also observed these actual everyday asymmetries and therefore constructed a hierarchy in social classifications when they placed the household in a specific class according to the ›Head of Household‹ or the ›Household Reference Person‹, the ›Chief Wage Earner‹, the ›Householder‹ etc. The different designations of the reference person indicate that it is not an easy task to name this person or to define this person without a normative bias. By taking the example of Great Britain, this article demonstrates that the definition of the ›Head of Household‹ was a normative category rather than a descriptive one, meaning that it was less able to facilitate analysis of social reality and that it fortified a normative view with the help of statistics. While feminists and other historical actors in different states, for example the U.S., already criticised the normative bias of the definition in the 1960s and 1970s, a different question seems to be of equal or even greater importance to the historian: How, when and why did different nations and professions decide to drop the normative in favour of a descriptive definition of the ›Head of Household‹? This leads to a more general question: How did administrators, statisticians and other survey researchers deal with the aim of longterm stability of statistical categories for the sake of comparability, e.g. in a national census, on the one hand, and with adaption to societal change on the other hand? In taking the example of the United Kingdom, the following story combines aspects of a history of knowledge with administrative history.<h4>About the Author</h4>Kerstin Brückweh studied history at the University of Bielefeld and Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. Her main field of interest are the nineteenth and twentieth cen- turies. She received an M.A. for a study of the history of medicine and medical ethics in the USA and wrote a Ph.D. thesis on the history of violence in Germany, which was published in 2006 as "Mordlust. Serienmorde, Gewalt und Emotionen im 20. Jahrhundert". Afterwards she turned to the history of knowledge with a study written at the German Historical Institute London, accepted as a Habilitation at the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen und published as “Menschen zählen. Wissensproduktion durch britische Volkszählungen und Umfragen vom 19. Jahrhundert bis ins digitale Zeitalter” in 2015. At the Centre for Contemporary History in Potsdam, she now leads a research group on the long history of “1989”, looking at regime change and everyday life in Eastern Germany.  
Publisher Institut für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung
Date 2016-08-10
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article

Format application/pdf
Source Administory. Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsgeschichte; Bd. 1 (2016): Verwaltungsgeschichte im Dialog/Administrative History in Dialogue
ADMINISTORY. Journal for the History of Public Administration; Bd. 1 (2016): Verwaltungsgeschichte im Dialog/Administrative History in Dialogue
Language eng
Coverage Grossbritannien
nach 1945
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Kerstin Brückweh

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us


Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library