Por Dentro da Caixa Preta da Inovação Social: Proposição de um Modelo Teórico-Explicativo Sobre o seu Processo de Desenvolvimento e Sugestões para Pesquisas Futuras

Revista de Administração IMED

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Por Dentro da Caixa Preta da Inovação Social: Proposição de um Modelo Teórico-Explicativo Sobre o seu Processo de Desenvolvimento e Sugestões para Pesquisas Futuras
Inside the Black box of the Social Innovation: Proposing a Theoretical-Explanatory Model on its Development Process and Suggestions for Future Research
 
Creator Morais da Silva, Rodrigo Luiz
Segatto, Andréa Paula
 
Subject Inovação social; problemas sociais; processo; modelo teórico-explicativo.
Social innovation; Social problems; Process; Theoretical-explanatory model
 
Description A inovação social vem sendo considerada como uma resposta aos problemas que afligem a sociedade, como a pobreza, a fome e os desafios relacionados aos limites dos recursos ambientais. Embora um considerável número de pesquisas tenha sido realizado, há espaço para contribuições que se dediquem a compreender o que ocorre dentro dessa “caixa preta”, em referência ao termo utilizado por Rosenberg (1982), a fim de melhor esclarecer o processo de inovação social. Nesse sentido, este estudo tem o objetivo de analisar o processo de inovação social e propor um modelo teórico-explicativo. Para tanto, é feita uma revisão das contribuições presentes na literatura sobre modelos utilizados para explicar o processo de inovação social. Uma vez constatada falta de consenso, foi sugerido um modelo teórico-explicativo como principal contribuição deste estudo. O modelo proposto apresenta o processo de inovação social como sendo composto por sete fases: investigação, análise e proposição de soluções, formalização e projeto piloto, manutenção, avaliação, escalabilidade, mudança social sistêmica. Além disso, este estudo chama atenção para o modo coletivo com que a inovação social é desenvolvida, embora os modelos publicados não revelem tal especificidade. A partir da perspectiva processual proposta, novas possibilidades de pesquisas podem ser desenvolvidas na tentativa de melhor compreender a trajetória de projetos de inovação social por meio de um olhar mais específico.
Social innovation has been considered as a response to the problems that afflict society, such as poverty, hunger, and challenges related to the limits of environmental resources. Although a considerable number of researches have been carried out, contributions are still needed to better understand what happens inside this “black box”, in reference to the term used by Rosenberg (1982), in order to clarify the process of social innovation. In this sense, this study aims to analyse the process of innovation and propose a theoretical-explanatory model. Therefore, a review of the contributions present in the literature on models used to explain the process of social innovation was developed. Once there was a lack of consensus, we suggested a theoretical-explanatory model as the main contribution of this study. The model proposed presents the social innovation process as being composed of seven phases: research, analysis and proposition of solutions, formalization and pilot design, maintenance, evaluation, scalability, systemic social change. In addition, this study draws attention to the collective way in which social innovation is developed, although the published models do not reveal such specificity. From the proposed procedural perspective, new research possibilities can be developed in an attempt to better understand the trajectory of social innovation projects through a more specific look.
 
Publisher Complexo de Ensino Superior Meridional S.A.
 
Contributor CAPES

 
Date 2020-10-05
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://seer.imed.edu.br/index.php/raimed/article/view/3535
10.18256/2237-7956.2020.v10i1.3535
 
Source Revista de Administração IMED; v. 10, n. 1 (2020): Janeiro-Junho; 3-22
2237-7956
10.18256/2237-7956.2020.v10i1
 
Language por
 
Relation https://seer.imed.edu.br/index.php/raimed/article/view/3535/2573
https://seer.imed.edu.br/index.php/raimed/article/downloadSuppFile/3535/1603
https://seer.imed.edu.br/index.php/raimed/article/downloadSuppFile/3535/1604
/*ref*/Austin, J. (2010). The collaboration challenge: how nonprofits and businesses succeed through strategic alliances. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
/*ref*/Bas, E., & Guillo, M. (2015). Participatory foresight for social innovation. FLUX-3D method (Forward Looking User Experience), a tool for evaluating innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 275–290.
/*ref*/Benneworth, P., & Cunha, J. (2015). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: reflections in theory & practice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 508–527.
/*ref*/Bhatt, P., & Altinay, L. (2013). How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? Management Decision, 51(9), 1772–1792.
/*ref*/Bignetti, L. P. (2011). As inovações sociais: uma incursão por ideias, tendências e focos de pesquisa. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, 47(1), 3–14.
/*ref*/Brest, P., & Born, K. (2013). When can impact investing create real impact. Standford Social Innovation Review, 21(4), 33–48.
/*ref*/Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: moving the field forward: a conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51.
/*ref*/Chalmers, D. M., & Balan-Vnuk, E. (2013). Innovating not-for-profit social ventures: Exploring the microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 785–810.
/*ref*/Cholez, C., Trompette, P., Vinck, D., & Reverdy, T. (2012). Bridging access to electricity through BOP markets: between economic equations and political configurations. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 713–732.
/*ref*/Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
/*ref*/Clarkin, J., & Cangioni, C. (2016). Impact investing: a primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135–173.
/*ref*/Credit Suisse, & Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship. (2012). Investment for impact: how social entrepreneurship is redefining the meaning of return. Recuperado em 10 agosto, 2016, de http://www.longfinance.net/images/reports/pdf/cs_impactinvesting_2012.pdf.
/*ref*/Crises - Le Centre de Recherche sur les Innovations Sociales. (2016). Les innovations sociales. Recuperado em 01 novembro, 2016, de http://crises.uqam.ca/le-centre/presentation.html.
/*ref*/Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: a critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.
/*ref*/Dagnino, R., Brandao, F., & Novaes, H. (2004). Sobre o marco analítico-conceitual da tecnologia social. In Tecnologia social: uma estratégia para o desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Banco do Brasil. p. 01-50.
/*ref*/Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: a provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21.
/*ref*/Dees, J., Anderson, B., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2004). Scaling social impact. Stanford Social Innovation, 1(4), 24–33.
/*ref*/Estensoro, M. (2015). How can social innovation be facilitated? Experiences from an action research process in a local network. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(6), 527–545.
/*ref*/Freeman, C. (1994). Innovation and growth. In Rothwell, R., & Dodson, M. (Eds.), The handbook of industrial innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 78-93.
/*ref*/Freitas, C. C. G., & Segatto, A. P. (2014). Ciência, tecnologia e sociedade pelo olhar da tecnologia social: um estudo a partir da teoria crítica da tecnologia. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 12(2), 302–320.
/*ref*/Herrera, M. E. B. (2015). Creating competitive advantage by institutionalizing corporate social innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1468–1474.
/*ref*/Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015a). Cross-sector collaboration, institutional gaps, and fragility: the role of social innovation partnerships in a conflict-affected region. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(2), 287–303.
/*ref*/Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015b). Partnerships for peace and dvelpment in fragile states: identifying missing links. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(4), 422–437.
/*ref*/Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. (2010). (Re)forming strategic cross-sector partnerships relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society, 49(1), 140–172.
/*ref*/Lettice, F., & Parekh, M. (2010). The social innovation process: themes, challenges and implications for practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 139–158.
/*ref*/Lim, C., Han, S., & Ito, H. (2013). Capability building through innovation for unserved lower end mega markets. Technovation, 33(12), 391–404.
/*ref*/Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Gordon, J. (2013). Social innovation, social entrepreneurship and the practice of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 747–763.
/*ref*/Mandell, M., & Steelman, T. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations: the importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review, 5(2), 197–224.
/*ref*/Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2002). Técnicas de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas.
/*ref*/Marshall, R. S. (2011). Conceptualizing the international for-profit social entrepreneur. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 183–198.
/*ref*/Morais-da-Silva, R. L., Takahashi, A. R. W., & Segatto, A. P. (2016). Scaling up social innovation: a meta-synthesis. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 134–163.
/*ref*/Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations Technology Governance Globalization, 1(2), 145–162.
/*ref*/Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press.
/*ref*/Mumford, M. (2002). Social innovation: ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253–266.
/*ref*/Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundations.
/*ref*/Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48–69.
/*ref*/Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. In Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (Eds.), Social innovation: blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 01-30.
/*ref*/OECD. (2002). Frascati manual: proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris.
/*ref*/Ojo, A., & Mellouli, S. (2018). Deploying governance networks for societal challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 106–112.
/*ref*/Perrini, F., Vurro, C., & Costanzo, L. A. (2010). A process-based view of social entrepreneurship: from opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(6), 515–534.
/*ref*/Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: a systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461.
/*ref*/Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation, 6(4), 34–43.
/*ref*/Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: buzz word or enduring term?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885.
/*ref*/Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 26, 1–26.
/*ref*/Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
/*ref*/Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura.
/*ref*/Schumpeter, J. A. (1997). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.
/*ref*/Smith, B., & Stevens, C. (2010). Different types of social entrepreneurship: the role of geography and embeddedness on the measurement and scaling of social value. Entrepreneurship and Regional, 22(6), 575–598.
/*ref*/Taylor, M., Dees, G., & Emerson, J. (2002). The question of scale: finding an appropriate strategy for building on your success. In Dees, G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (Eds.), Strategic tools for social entrepreneurs: enhancing the performance of your enterprising nonprofit. New York: Wiley. p. 117-139.
/*ref*/Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 169–183.
/*ref*/van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: an emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935.
/*ref*/Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.
/*ref*/Westley, F., Antadze, N., Riddell, D. J., Robinson, K., & Geobey, S. (2014). Five configurations for scaling up social innovation: case examples of nonprofit organizations from Canada. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(3), 234–260.
/*ref*/Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology, 54(4), 38–45.
/*ref*/Ziegler, R. (2010). Innovations in doing and being: capability innovations at the intersection of Schumpeterian political economy and human development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 255–272.
 
Rights Direitos autorais 2020 Rodrigo Luiz Morais-da-Silva, Segatto Paula Andréa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library