An Analysis of Variation Sources in Written Corrective Feedback Studies: What is the Next Step?

Revista Educación

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title An Analysis of Variation Sources in Written Corrective Feedback Studies: What is the Next Step?
Un análisis de las fuentes de variación en los estudios de retroalimentación correctiva escrita: ¿Cuál es el siguiente paso?
 
Creator López, Marisela Bonilla
 
Subject Written corrective feedback
Sources of variation
L2 research and practice
Retroalimentación de corrección lingüística
Fuentes de variación
L2 Investigación y práctica
 
Description While there is a significant amount of compelling evidence to support written corrective feedback (error correction), it is also acknowledged that research findings may not be applicable or conclusive enough given the great variability among studies. Nevertheless, no systematic attempt has been made to review and synthesize the extensive amount of literature to identify the sources that lead to such variation. This study aims to identify such variables. Results indicate that in a research base of 76 relevant publications, variations can be explained based on 11 main sources. Pursuant to these findings, this study sketches the main variance-related problems and outlines design recommendations to further expand L2 research and practice of error correction in Second Language Acquisition.  
Existe una cantidad significativa de evidencia convincente a favor de la retroalimentación correctiva escrita (corrección de errores). Sin embargo, se reconoce que los resultados que arrojan las investigaciones quizás no sean tan pertinentes o lo suficientemente concluyentes debido a la gran variabilidad que hay entre los estudios. Aun así, no se ha hecho ningún intento sistemático de revisar y sintetizar la literatura de manera tal que se identifiquen las fuentes que causan tanta variación. Este artículo busca identificar esas variables. Los resultados indican que en una base de investigación que comprende 76 publicaciones relevantes, la variación puede explicarse a la luz de 11 fuentes principales. Este estudio también resume los problemas más significativos y propone recomendaciones de diseño para expandir la investigación y práctica de la corrección de errores en la enseñanza de una segunda lengua.
 
Publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
 
Date 2020-04-27
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
application/zip
 
Identifier https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/article/view/38727
10.15517/revedu.v44i2.38727
 
Source Revista Educación; Vol. 44, Num. 2 (2020): Revista Educación (julio-diciembre); 457-478
Revista Educación - Journal of Education; Vol. 44, Num. 2 (2020): Journal of Education (july-december); 457-478
Revista de Educación; Vol. 44, Num. 2 (2020): Revista Educación (julio-diciembre); 457-478
2215-2644
0379-7082
 
Language spa
 
Relation https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/article/view/38727/42865
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/article/view/38727/42866
/*ref*/Abedi, R., Latifi, M., & Moinzadeh, A. (2010). The effect of error correction vs. error detection on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners’ writing achievement. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 168-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p168 Ahmadi, D., Maftoon, P., & Mehrdad, A. (2012). Investigating the Effects of Two Types of Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2590–2595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.529 Asassfeh, S. (2013). Corrective Feedback (CF) and English-Major EFL Learners’ Ability in Grammatical Error Detection and Correction. English Language Teaching, 6(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n8p85 Aveyard, H. (2010). Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw. Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2018). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702–726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921 Bitchener. J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 Bitchener, J. (2009). Measuring the Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback: A response to “Overgeneralization from a Narrow Focus: A Response to Bitchener (2008).” Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 276–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.06.001 Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. UK: Routledge. Bitchener. (2012). A Reflection on ‘The Language Learning Potential’ of Written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348–363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006 Bitchener, J. (2016). To what extent has the published written CF research aided our understanding of its potential for L2 development? ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(2), 111–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2009a). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37(2), 322–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.12.006 Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2009b). The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn043 Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002 Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001 Bonilla, M., Van Steendam, E., & Buyse, K. (2017). Comprehensive Corrective Feedback on Low and High Proficiency Writers: Examining Attitudes and Preferences. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 91–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.04bon Bonilla, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2018). The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class: Comprehensive Feedback in the L2 Writing Class. Language Learning, 68(3), 813–850. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12295 Brown, D. (2012). The Written Corrective Feedback Debate: Next Steps for Classroom Teachers and Practitioners. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 861–867. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.63 Bruton, A. (2009a). Designing Research into the Effects of Grammar Correction in L2 Writing: Not So Straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 136–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005 Bruton, A. (2009b). Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were…. System, 37(4), 600–613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.005 Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 Chaudron, C. (1984). The Effects of Feedback on Students’ Composition Revisions. RELC Journal, 15(2), 1–14. Cohen, A. (1987). Studying Learner Strategies: How We Get the Information. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 31–40). UK: Prentice Hall. Diab, N. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001 El-Ebyary, K., & Windeatt, S. (2010). The Impact of Computer-Based Feedback on Students’ Written Work. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 121–142. Ellis, R. (2009). A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023 Ellis, R. (2010). A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 335–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544 Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context. System, 36(3), 353–371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001 Evans, N., Hartshorn, K., McCollum, R., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing Pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445–463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367 Evans, N., Hartshorn, K., & Strong-Krause, D. (2011). The Efficacy of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback for University-Matriculated ESL Learners. System, 39(2), 229–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.04.012 Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S. (2012). The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High- proficient L2 Learners. World Journal of Education, 2(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p49 Fathman, A. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher Response to Student Writing: Focus on Form Versus Content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 178–190). New York: Cambridge University Press. Fazio, L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority-and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235–249. Ferris, D. (1997). The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588049 Ferris, D. (1999). The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes: A Response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6 Ferris, D. (2004). The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005 Ferris, D. (2006). Does Error Feedback Help Student Writers? New Evidence on the Short and Long-Term Effects of Written Error Correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 81–104). New York: Cambridge University Press. Ferris, D. (2010). Second Language Writing Research and Written Corrective Feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 181–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490 Ferris, D., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009 Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How Explicit Does it Need to Be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 329–344. Frear, D., & Chiu, Y. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.006 Gaskell, D., & Cobb, T. (2004). Can Learners Use Concordance Feedback for Writing Errors? System, 32(3), 301–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.001 Goldstein, L. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 63–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.006 Guénette, D. (2007). Is Feedback Pedagogically Correct? Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001 Guénette, D. (2012). The Pedagogy of Error Correction: Surviving the Written Corrective Feedback Challenge. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 117-126. Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and Uptake: Addressing Pre-articulated Covert Problems in L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 332–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.008 Hartshorn, K., Evans, N., Merrill, P., Sudweeks, R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. (2010). Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781 Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative Oral/Aural Revision in Foreign Language Writing Instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 255–276. Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent Theory, Research, and Practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387–398. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Language Teaching, 39(02), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399 Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189 Kepner, C. (1991). An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313. Lalande, J. (1982). Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 66(2), 140–149. Lavolette, E., Polio, C., & Kahng, J. (2015). The Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Feedback and Students’ Responses to It. Language, Learning & Technology, 19(2). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2BlItLL Lee, I. (1997). ESL Learners’ Performance in Error Correction in Writing: Some Implications for Teaching. System, 25(4), 465–477. Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in Writing: Issues and Challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009 Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological Synthesis of Research on the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011 MacDonald, R. (1991). Developmental students’ processing of teacher feedback in composition instruction. Review of Research in Developmental Education, 8(5), 1-8. Manchón, R. (2011). Learning-to-write and Writing-to-Learn in an Additional Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Martínez, E., & De Larios, R. (2010). The Use of Models as a Form of Written Feedback to Secondary School Pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 143–170. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Murphy, L., & De Larios, R. (2010). Feedback in Second Language Writing: An Introduction. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1-15. Nagata, N. (1997). The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Metalinguistic Instruction: A Case Study in Japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 187–200. Polio, C. (2012). The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 375–389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 Qi, D., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the Role of Noticing in a Three-Stage Second Language Writing Task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 277–303. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback for the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 133–164). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Sampson, A. (2012). “Coded and Uncoded Error Feedback: Effects on Error Frequencies in Adult Colombian EFL learners Writing”. System, 40(4), 494–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.001 Santos, M., López-Serrano, S., & Manchón, R. (2010). The differential effect of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction. IJES, International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 131–154. Semke, H. (1984). Effects of the Red Pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202. Sheen, Y. (2007). The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/40264353 Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential Effects of Oral and Written Corrective Feedback in the ESL Classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990507 Sheppard, K. (1992). Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? RELC Journal, 23(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300107 Shintani, N. (2015). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517-538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400 Shintani, N. & Aubrey, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer-Mediated Environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12317 Shintani, & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 Shintani, N, & Ellis, R. (2015). Does language analytical ability mediate the effect of written feedback on grammatical accuracy in second language writing? System, 49, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.006 Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures: Effects of Written Feedback and Revision. Language Learning, 64(1), 103–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12029 Stefanou, C., & Révész, A. (2015). Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 263–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12212 Stiff, R. (1967). The Effect upon Student Composition of Particular Correction Techniques. Research in the Teaching of English, 1(1), 54–75. Storch, N. (2010). Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29–46. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ Processing, Uptake and Retention of Corrective Feedback on Writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 303–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532 Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting Errors for Selective Error Correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27(2), 93–108. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and Conjecture on the Effects of Correction: A Response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.002 Truscott, J. (2007). The Effect of Error Correction on Learners’ Ability to Write Accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003 Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error Correction, Revision, and Learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003 Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1–27. Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback on L2 Learners’ Written Accuracy. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279–296. Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing: Effectiveness of Comprehensive CF. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
 
Rights Derechos de autor 2020 Revista Educación
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cr/deed.en_US
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library