THE MISERIES OF THE PREVENTIVE PRISON. THE DIFFICULTY OF UNDERSTANDING THE INQUISITIVE PARADIGM OF OUR PROCEDURAL SYSTEM

Vox Juris 1

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title THE MISERIES OF THE PREVENTIVE PRISON. THE DIFFICULTY OF UNDERSTANDING THE INQUISITIVE PARADIGM OF OUR PROCEDURAL SYSTEM
Las miserias de la prisión preventiva. La dificultad de desterrar el paradigma inquisitivo de nuestro sistema procesal
 
Creator Espinoza Bonifaz, Renzo; Universidad de San Martín de Porres
 
Subject



Prisión preventiva, derechos fundamentales, presupuestos materiales, plazo razonable

 
Description The objective of this research work is to examine the procedural institution of the Preventive Prison. For this purpose, it intends to specify if this measure is compatible with the paradigm change of our procedural system, and establish what is the reason for its existence. It also emphasizes the importance of language to build the meaning of legal institutions, thereby seeking to determine the legal nature of the Prison, deconstruct their material budgets, and question their current term. Finally, it concludes by providing recommendations to rationalize the use of the Preventive Prison, and noting that while currently seeking to propose criteria to harmonize with constitutional standards, it is impossible, because a Constitutional State can not admit that this institution inherited from the system Inquisitive remains in force, because it violates the state of innocence and the right not to be deprived of freedom without prior trial.
El presente trabajo de investigación tiene como objetivo examinar la institución procesal de la Prisión Preventiva. Para ello, pretende precisar si esta medida resulta compatible con el cambio de paradigma de nuestro sistema procesal, y establecer cuál es la razón de su existencia. Asimismo, recalca la importancia del lenguaje para construir el sentido de las instituciones jurídicas, con ello, busca determinar la naturaleza jurídica de la Prisión Preventiva, deconstruir sus presupuestos materiales, y cuestionar su plazo de duración actual. Finalmente, concluye brindando recomendaciones para racionalizar el uso de la Prisión Preventiva, y señalando que si bien actualmente se pretenden proponer criterios para armonizarla con las normas constitucionales, ello resulta imposible, pues un Estado Constitucional de Derecho no puede admitir que esta institución heredada del sistema inquisitivo permanezca vigente, pues vulnera el estado de inocencia y el derecho a no ser privado de la libertad sin juicio previo.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24265/voxjuris.2020.v38n1.13
 
Publisher Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres
 
Contributor

 
Date 2019-12-03
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion



 
Format application/pdf
application/xml
 
Identifier https://www.aulavirtualusmp.pe/ojs/index.php/VJ/article/view/1726
 
Source Vox Juris; Vol. 38, Núm. 1 (2020); 255-278
2521-5280
1812-6864
 
Language spa
 
Relation https://www.aulavirtualusmp.pe/ojs/index.php/VJ/article/view/1726/1788
https://www.aulavirtualusmp.pe/ojs/index.php/VJ/article/view/1726/1915
 
Coverage





 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Renzo Espinoza Bonifaz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library