Complements and/or Substitutes? The Competitive Dynamics Between News Publishers and Digital Platforms and What It Means for Competition Policy

Italian Antitrust Review

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Complements and/or Substitutes? The Competitive Dynamics Between News Publishers and Digital Platforms and What It Means for Competition Policy
 
Creator Geradin, Damien
 
Subject
News publishers; newspapers; digital platforms; Google; Facebook; Twitter; online advertising; ad tech; competition; big data; joint negotiations; collective societies

 
Description This paper analyses the competitive dynamics between news publishers and digital platforms. News publishers and digital platforms are vertical complements in that news publishers publish content that helps digital platforms to attract users, while digital platforms generate traffic for news publishers. News publishers and digital platforms also horizontally compete for user attention and advertising revenues. Internet users in search of news can go to the website of their favourite newspaper, but they may also go to Google News, Facebook or Twitter. Similarly, advertisers can spend their online advertising budget on news publishers, but also on Google or Facebook online properties.Whether the relationship between news publishers and digital platforms is of a vertical or horizontal nature – or a combination of both – has implications for competition policy. From a vertical standpoint, some of Google and Facebook’s practices vis-à-vis news publishers could be exploitative in nature. Exploitative cases are, however, difficult to run and exploitation is not illegal in some jurisdictions. Thus, other avenues may need to be explored to counterbalance the digital platform’s market power and create a sustainable source of income for news publishers, such as, for instance, joint bargaining or the creation of collective licensing mechanisms for their rights.From a horizontal standpoint, while digital platforms cannot be blamed for seeking to maximize their revenues, competition authorities should however prevent them from engaging in strategies that draw traffic away from news publishers and deprive them of advertising opportunities, either through self-preferencing, discrimination, the imposition of formats and standards that reduce the ability of news publishers to monetize their content, or by making it harder for them to access the data generated by the users’ interaction with their content.
 
Publisher Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato / Italian Competition Authority
 
Contributor
 
Date 2019-12-30
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://a-p-p-review.com/article/view/12885
10.12870/iar-12885
http://a-p-p-review.com/article/download/12885/11664
 
Source Rivista Italiana di Antitrust / Italian Antitrust Review; 2019: n. O
Antitrust & Public Policies; 2019: n. O
2284-3272
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://a-p-p-review.com/article/view/12885/11664
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Antitrust & Public Policies
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library