Interpretation Of Judges In Supreme Court Decision Number: 46 P/HUM/2018

Substantive Justice International Journal of Law

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Interpretation Of Judges In Supreme Court Decision Number: 46 P/HUM/2018
Interpretation Of Judges In Supreme Court Decision Number: 46 P/HUM/2018
 
Creator Yusuf, Muslim Andi
Fidyansari, Dharma
 
Description This research was conducted to determine the interpretation of judges in the Supreme Court Decision No. 46 P/HUM/2018. This study uses a normative type of research with an approach to identifying legislation and literature that is relevant to research. Data collected from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively, arranged systematically, and presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that in the Supreme Court Decision Number 46 P/HUM/2018 which judges that Article 4 paragraph (3), Article 11 Paragraph (1) Letter d and Appendix Model B.3 Election Commission Regulation Number 20 of 2018 is contradictory to Law Number 17 of 2017 concerning General Election in conjunction with Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Regulations and Judges’ Considerations based on the interpretation of the testing object test stones namely the sentences in the text of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Formation of Legislation as a guide so that the interpretation of judges is based on exploring the meaning contained in the statement written norm text by studying the book in sentence structure or its relationship with other rules.
 
Publisher SJIJL, Publication Unit, Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia
 
Date 2019-12-09
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/43
10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.43
 
Source Substantive Justice International Journal of Law; Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law; 147-160
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law; Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law; 147-160
2599-0462
10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/43/35
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Muslim Andi Yusuf, Dharma Fidyansari (Author)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library