Paradoks Kewajiban Bersaksi pada Ketentuan Hukum Acara Perdata

ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata

View Publication Info
Field Value
Title Paradoks Kewajiban Bersaksi pada Ketentuan Hukum Acara Perdata
Creator Adlhiyati, Zakki
Subject Court; Obligation; Witness.
Description Analyzing witness obligation in giving testimony according to Indonesian civil procedural law is the objective of this writing. With the normative judicial method, concluded There is inconsistency in Indonesian civil procedural law in regulating the witness obligation. Punishment is provided for a witness when they neglected the hearing summons as regulated in Article 140 HIR/157 RBG, but in contrast article 143 HIR/170 RBG stated that no one may be forced to come before a court to testify in civil matters if the district court beyond their resides. Giving the same regulation with the current civil procedural law, the civil procedural law bill shows contradiction within its law and also with another law. Abandonment of court summons as a witness is a criminal offense with a sentence of six months in prison (Article 224 paragraph of the Criminal Code). The inconsistency and contradiction to some extent may bring negative impact to law enforcement and the law should be an amendment.
Publisher Departemen Hukum Perdata
Date 2019-05-01
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Peer-reviewed Article
Format application/pdf
Source ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata; Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli – Desember 2018; 129-144
Language eng
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us


Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library