Chest compression effectiveness with vs without feedback

Alberta Academic Review

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Chest compression effectiveness with vs without feedback
 
Creator Yang, BinGe
Douma, Matthew
Picard, Christopher
 
Subject CPR
chest compressions
cardiac arrest
 
Description The objective of this experiment is to assess clinician perceived versus actual compression quality, and to evaluate the impact of using feedback from the Laerdal CPRMeter2 on compression quality.  In our setup, we have a total of eighty four participants (43 from the Royal Alex and 41 from the Misericordia hospital). We monitored CPR quality based on the guidelines by Heart and Stroke, which breaks down chest compression effectiveness into three areas- Release, Depth and Rate. Proper Guidelines: Compress the chest at least 5cm (2inches); Compress at a rate of 100 to 120 beats per minute; Allow the chest to recoil completely after each compression. Clinical Setup: A convenience sample of participants performed two minutes of uninterrupted chest compressions on a Laerdal Resusci Anne with a CPRmeter2 on top without feedback, followed by a two minute rest period to fill out a Q.I tracking form. They later repeated the two minutes of chest compressions with the display of the CPRmeter uncovered, with the feedback visible. The chest compression metrics from the trials were compared using a data tracking form. From the data collected, enough evidence shows that the CPRmeter2 is able to improve release, rate and overall CPR quality. After filling out the survey, all of the nurses agree that the device is very useful in giving feedback and should be used in future CPR classes. Furthermore, data collected from the Q.I tracking forms indicates that nurses and other health clinicians are inadequate in predicting their own CPR abilities. Often times, nurses would either overpredict or underpredict their scores on the CPR meter. From the data gathered, the CPRmeter2 is going to be used for training in future CPR classes. Just recently, the device has been incorporated into code calls in the emergency department at the Misericordia. A T-test was done on the findings from the experiment to test if the means of two sets of data are significantly different from each other. Based on our findings, the t-test values for rate, release, and overall quality are statistically significant, meaning that the null hypothesis is rejected.
 
 
Publisher Alberta Academic Review Ltd
 
Date 2019-09-24
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Special Conference Issue (Non-peer review)
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://albertaacademicreview.com/index.php/aar/article/view/77
10.29173/aar77
 
Source Alberta Academic Review; Vol 2 No 2 (2019): WISEST special edition; 83-84
2561-5335
2561-5327
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://albertaacademicreview.com/index.php/aar/article/view/77/46
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Matthew Douma, Chris Picard
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library