KAJIAN YURIDIS KLAUSULA ARBITRASE DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN

Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title KAJIAN YURIDIS KLAUSULA ARBITRASE DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN
KAJIAN YURIDIS KLAUSULA ARBITRASE DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN
 
Creator Hutajulu, Marihot Janpieter
 
Description Penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase sudah menjadi sarana penyelesaian sengketa utang-piutang yang berlaku universal di dunia perniagaan. Namun, ketika terjadi sengketa di antara kreditor dan debitor, klausula arbitrase yang telah disepakati di dalam perjanjian utang-piutangnya dimungkinkan untuk disimpangi dengan mengajukan permohonan kepailitan kepada pengadilan niaga. Tulisan ini hendak mendiskusikan bagaimana klausula arbitrase dalam perkara kepailitan dikaitkan dengan prinsip Commercial Exit from Finansial Distress dalam hukum kepailitan yang seharusnya diutamakan dalam setiap penyelesaian perkara kepailitan. Penelitian ini menemukan adanya ketidakharmonisan antara UU Arbitrase dan UU Kepailitan di Indonesia dalam konteks pengutamaan prinsip penyelesaian sengketa bisnis melalui arbitrase dan prinsip lembaga kepailitan sebagai sarana untuk menolong debitor yang beritikad baik. Namun demikian, putusan pengadilan niaga masih ada yang konsisten menyatakan tidak berwenang untuk memeriksa dan mengadili permohonan kepailitan yang di dalam perjanjian bisnis di antara kreditor dan debitornya telah berisi klausula arbitrase.
Arbitration is universally known as a tool of out-of-court settlement to solve debt dispute between a creditor and a debtor in a commercial activity. In fact, arbitration clauses which are agreed by the parties of a business contract might be deviated by submitting the bankruptcy dispute before the commercial court. This study  discusses the relationship between arbitration clause in bankruptcy dispute and the principle of ‘commercial exit from finansial distress’ in bankruptcy law which has to be prioritized in each bankruptcy dispute. In conclusion, the study discovers a disharmony between Arbitration Law and Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia in the context to stress arbitration as an instrument of dispute resolution and the principle of bankruptcy institution as a mean to assist the debtor who already has good faith to pay his debts. However in practice, there are some decisions of commercial courts that states consistently they have no authority to examine and adjudicate bankruptcy dispute on the business contract between creditor and debitor. 
 
Publisher Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
 
Date 2019-09-12
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum/article/view/2733
10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p175-192
 
Source Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum; 175-192
2541-5417
2541-4984
10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2
 
Language ind
 
Relation https://ejournal.uksw.edu/refleksihukum/article/view/2733/1264
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library