What is a Psychological Task? The Operational Pliability of “Task” in Psychological Laboratory Experimentation

Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title What is a Psychological Task? The Operational Pliability of “Task” in Psychological Laboratory Experimentation
 
Creator Morrison, Hazel
McBriar, Shannon
Powell, Hilary
Proudfoot, Jesse
Stanley, Steven
Fitzgerald, Des
Callard, Felicity
 
Subject STS; medical humanities; sociology; geography; psychology
experiments; mind wandering; operational pliability; psychology; qualitative interviews; task
 
Description There has been no sustained sociological analysis of a near ubiquitous feature of psychological laboratory experimentation: the task. Yet the task is central in arranging the means by which phenomena are isolated and brought into the experimental scientist’s purview. As scientific objects, states such as mind wandering and daydreaming have been made visible in experiments that draw on a (sometimes) sharp distinction between what it means to be either “on task” or “off task”––which entails a long history of what it means to have a subject attend to her task, a central aspect of the psychology experiment since its foundation. Through an analysis of qualitative interviews with research participants in studies of so-called “mind wandering,” it becomes clear that task is deployed and understood in multiple ways: it is often hard to distinguish when a person is on task and when they are not; when participants reflect on their own internal states the boundedness that the concept relies upon is drawn sharply into question; and the complex spatio-temporal organization of experiences of both mind wandering and task disrupts the metaphorical structures that the scientific literature has baked into these terms. The term “operational pliability” allows us to understand how the pliability of the practice and concept of task is central to how task functions. Operational pliability offers a way of understanding how particular elements in scientific investigation are easily adaptable and at the same time are able to hold some kind of shape or form.
 
Publisher The Society for Social Studies of Science
 
Contributor Volkswagen Foundation
 
Date 2019-03-23
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Qualitative interviews; literary analysis
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/274
10.17351/ests2019.274
 
Source Engaging Science, Technology, and Society; Vol 5 (2019); 61-85
2413-8053
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/274/169
 
Coverage United Kingdom
The present

 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Hazel Morrison, Shannon McBriar, Hilary Powell, Jesse Proudfoot, Steven Stanley, Des Fitzgerald, Felicity Callard
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library