Proof Power of Authentic Deed Transfer of Land Rights in Legal Perspective of Civil Procedures

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Proof Power of Authentic Deed Transfer of Land Rights in Legal Perspective of Civil Procedures
 
Creator Anrova, Yuda; Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Suparman, Eman; Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Kusmayanti, Hazar; Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
 
Subject
Proof; Land Rights; Authentic Deed; Supreme Court; Civil Law

 
Description Introduction to The Problem: Evidence is a process carried out by the parties in resolving disputes to prove the arguments presented before the judge who decides the legal dispute so that the judge can decide as fairly as possible. Evidence under the civil procedure law is regulated in Article 164 HIR. Supreme Court decision number 3591K/Pdt/2018 discusses documentary evidence in the form of an agreement to transfer and transfer land rights and states that the deed has no legal force.Purpose/Objective Study: The purpose of the study was to determine the legal considerations for the strength of authentic deed evidence in the Supreme Court Decision number 3591K/Pdt/2018, connected with civil procedural law. The research method used is a normative juridical approach to the research specification in descriptive-analytical analysis and qualitative normative.Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this research is normative juridical research which focuses on the applicable legal provisions.Findings: The research results that the authentic deed submitted by the Defendants in the Reconvention as evidence has external and formal evidentiary power. However, authentic deeds that are perfect and binding do not have a coercive or decisive character. Authentic deed evidence can be invalidated if there is evidence of the opponent which can prove otherwise. Based on the decision of the Supreme Court number 3591K/Pdt/2018, the Notarial Deed of the Transfer of Land Rights Agreement has no legal force because land rights have been transferred and building use rights are attached.Paper Type: Research Article 
 
Publisher Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
 
Contributor
 
Date 2021-10-05
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
normative juridical
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/18604
10.26555/novelty.v12i2.a18604
 
Source Jurnal Hukum Novelty; Vol 12, No 2 (2021); 237-247
2550-0090
1412-6834
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Novelty/article/view/18604/pdf_77
 
Coverage

Research Article
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Hukum Novelty
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library