Conflicting representations on Armenian genocide: exploring the relational future through self-inquiring technique

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Conflicting representations on Armenian genocide: exploring the relational future through self-inquiring technique
 
Creator Mamali, Cătălin
Kivu, Mircea
Kutnik, Jan
 
Subject accuracy of historical knowledge
alchemical language
conflicting representations
interrogative orientation
answer (knowledge) certainty
accuracy of historical knowledge
alchemical language
conflicting representations
interrogative orientation
answer (knowledge) certainty
 
Description Major lethal conflicts (war crimes, genocides) between large social actors include many times opposing social representations, narratives and practical approaches to the events worked out by those placed on the aggressor or aggressed, perpetrators or victims’ side. War crimes and genocides seem to be historically associated, mainly in the case of dictatorial regimes, with system-atic repression not only of the information about such events but also of the interrogative potential of common people about the events. The study proposes that such conflicting representations cannot be approached only by questions pre-established by the researchers to which the participants are supposed to answer. Methodologically and theoretically it is justified to explore the assumptions and the questions that can be triggered by the pres­entation of conflicts to the participants who are supposed to look to the same conflict from both sides. Besides the use of national representative samples and of convenience samples before and after the 100 years commemoration of the 1915 Armenian geno­cide the study presents the findings based on self-inquiry tech­nique applied at three levels of social complexity: (a) societal level, with questions directed to the general universe of discourse implied by the 1915 events; (b) at interpersonal level with ques­tions directed to actors with leading roles on both sides; (c) at the individual level stimulating questions about 1915 genocide that are explicitly self-directed. We suggest, based on the find­ings, that the expression of the questioning potential on trag­ic events is useful for the relational future of the sides involved in the conflicts.
Major lethal conflicts (war crimes, genocides) between large social actors include many times opposing social representations, narratives and practical approaches to the events worked out by those placed on the aggressor or aggressed, perpetrators or victims’ side. War crimes and genocides seem to be historically associated, mainly in the case of dictatorial regimes, with system-atic repression not only of the information about such events but also of the interrogative potential of common people about the events. The study proposes that such conflicting representations cannot be approached only by questions pre-established by the researchers to which the participants are supposed to answer. Methodologically and theoretically it is justified to explore the assumptions and the questions that can be triggered by the pres­entation of conflicts to the participants who are supposed to look to the same conflict from both sides. Besides the use of national representative samples and of convenience samples before and after the 100 years commemoration of the 1915 Armenian geno­cide the study presents the findings based on self-inquiry tech­nique applied at three levels of social complexity: (a) societal level, with questions directed to the general universe of discourse implied by the 1915 events; (b) at interpersonal level with ques­tions directed to actors with leading roles on both sides; (c) at the individual level stimulating questions about 1915 genocide that are explicitly self-directed. We suggest, based on the find­ings, that the expression of the questioning potential on trag­ic events is useful for the relational future of the sides involved in the conflicts.
 
Publisher Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
 
Date 2019-06-02
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/23195
10.14746/fped.2018.7.2.2019.8.1.9
 
Source Public Philosophy & Democratic Education; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019): Contemporary Challenges in Education and Professional Life; 168-250
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna; Tom 8 Nr 1 (2019): Współczesne wyzwania w edukacji i życiu zawodowym; 168-250
2299-1875
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/23195/21837
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Cătălin Mamali, Mircea Kivu, Jan Kutnik
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library