Deskryptywność i normatywność – horyzonty dialogicznej wizji człowieka

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Deskryptywność i normatywność – horyzonty dialogicznej wizji człowieka
Descriptivism and normativism as a horizons of dialogical concept of human
 
Creator Glinkowski, Witold P.
 
Subject question about human
philosophy of dialogue
anthropological philosophy
question about human
philosophy of dialogue
anthropological philosophy
 
Description Question about human is the basic thread of contemporary philosophy of dialogue. It does not cause neither systematic concept of human, nor any system of anthropology (in meaning proposed by twentieth-century initiators), but impacts on marginalization of anthropological imponderabilia. Negatively – it was caused by refusal anthropological projects belonging to philosophical heritage by Philosophers of Dialogue. Positively – it was related to new anthropological perspective formulated by these philosophers. By asking questions about human they amend the old yet still important oppositions: nature versus culture and nature versus history (being variant of this first one). The most essential matter in their perspective is opposition between what belongs to nature (different from biological assumptions) and what is relevant to normative perspective. This suspense between two planes – descriptive and prescriptive – seems to be a consequence of the philosophical assumptions of Philosophers of Dialogue and argument for polifonia of anthropological discourse.
Question about human is the basic thread of contemporary philosophy of dialogue. It does not cause neither systematicconcept of human, nor any system of anthropology (in meaningproposed by twentieth-century initiators), but impacts on marginalization of anthropological imponderabilia. Negatively – it was caused by refusal anthropological projects belonging to philosophical heritage by Philosophers of Dialogue. Positively – it was related to new anthropological perspective formulatedby these philosophers. By asking questions about human they amend the old yet still important oppositions: nature versus culture and nature versus history (being variant of this firstone). The most essential matter in their perspective is opposition between what belongs to nature (different from biological assumptions) and what is relevant to normative perspective. This suspense between two planes – descriptive and prescriptive – seems to be a consequence of the philosophical assumptions of Philosophers of Dialogue and argument for polifonia of anthropological discourse.
 
Publisher Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
 
Date 2017-06-15
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Recenzowany artykuł
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/12309
10.14746/fped.2017.6.1.3
 
Source Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna; Tom 6 Nr 1 (2017): Człowiek a problem humanizmu; 33-52
Public Philosophy & Democratic Education; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): The Human and a Poroblem of Humanism; 33-52
2299-1875
 
Language pol
 
Relation http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/fped/article/view/12309/12175
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library