The Problem: Low Achieving Districts and Low Performing Boards

International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership

View Publication Info
Field Value
Title The Problem: Low Achieving Districts and Low Performing Boards
Creator Lee, David E.; University of Southern Mississippi
Eadens, Daniel Wayne; Northern Arizona University
School Board; Educational Leadership; Education; Board; Reform; Accountability
Description Effective school districts maintain superintendent and school board collegiality which can foster success and connectedness among members. Delagardelle and Alsbury (2008) found that superintendents and board members are not consistent in their perceptions about the work the board does, and Glass (2007) found that states do not require boards to undergo evaluation for effectiveness. In the current study, 115 board meetings were observed using the School Board Video Project (SBVP) survey, which was created in 2012 by researchers to uncover school board meetings’ effectiveness. MANOVA, Univariate ANOVA, and Pearson Chi-Square test results revealed significant differences between low-, medium-, and high-performing districts’ school board meetings. Evidence indicated that low-performing districts’ board meetings were: less orderly; had less time spent on student achievement; lacked respectful and attentive engagement across speakers; had board meeting members who seemed to advance their own agenda; had less effective working relationships among the governance team; had fewer board members who relied on the superintendent for advice and input; had one member, other than the board president, stand out for taking excessive time during meetings; and did not focus on policy items as much as high- and medium-performing school districts. The research concluded that more school board members from low-performing districts needed training to improve their effectiveness. Furthermore, highly refined and target-enhanced school board training programs might lead to lasting governance success and more effective teaming that could improve district, and ultimately, student achievement.
Publisher IJEPL is a joint publication of PDK International, SFU, and GMU
Contributor USM and NAU
Date 2014-10-21
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Quantitative: Survey
Format application/pdf
Source International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership; Vol 9, No 3 (2014): The Problem: Low-Achieving Districts and Low-Performing Boards
Language eng
Rights Copyright (c) 2015 David E. Lee, Daniel Wayne Eadens

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us


Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library