Genotype by Environment interactions for egg number and egg weight of five dual-purpose chicken breeds in different zones of Oromia region in Ethiopia.

Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Genotype by Environment interactions for egg number and egg weight of five dual-purpose chicken breeds in different zones of Oromia region in Ethiopia.
 
Creator de Kinderen, Maud Allegonda Johanna
Sölkner, Johann
Mészáros, Gábor
Alemu, Setegn Worku
Esatu, Wondmeneh
Bastiaansen, John W.M.
Komen, Hans
Dessie, Tadelle
 
Description Submitted 2020-07-05 | Accepted 2020-08-14 | Available 2020-12-01https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.205-213The African Chicken Genetic Gain (ACGG) project (https://africacgg.net/) aims at backyard poultry optimization by commercial dual-purpose breeds introduction into Africa. To measure benefits, genotype by environment interaction (GxE) analysis provides guidance while predicting environmental effects on production traits of breeds. A survey among Ethiopian poultry smallholders showed egg sale being the most important purpose of keeping village chickens in Oromia. Data was available about laying of 894 ACGG chickens in Oromia. Hence current research questions were: 1) Does GxE take place? 2) Which breed performs best regarding laying and in which environment within Oromia? Traits investigated were egg number and egg weight of five breeds (S-RIR, Sasso, Horro, Kuroiler and Koekoek) located in three zones (East Hararge, East and West Shoa) and 5 districts (Adami Tulu, Bako Tibe, Dano, Dugda and Haromaya) in Oromia. Observations were taken as group measure performing weighted analyses. GxE was only present for egg number with magnitude strongest for zone. S-RIR performed best for both traits in both environments, except Kuroiler performing better in East Shoa for egg number and Koekoek for egg weight. This indicates success of crossbreed S-RIR. Sasso and Horro performed worst supported by previous research for Horro but not Sasso. Low precipitation in East Shoa caused bigger distance in egg number predictions, being higher for S-RIR and lower for Horro and Sasso compared to West Shoa. Apart from these final conclusions, social context of breeding and data collection difficulties should not be forgotten. Just like relevance of other performance trait analyses.Keywords: Ethiopia, smallholder farming, poultry, laying, genetic gainReferencesAbegaz, S. et al. (2019, July 29-August 2). On-farm performance testing of tropically adaptable chicken strains under small holder management in three countries of sub-Saharan Africa. [Conference presentation paper]. Seventh All Africa conference on Animal Agriculture, Accra, Ghana. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106373Ali, K. et al. (2000). Genotype×Environment Interaction in Growing Chickens: Comparison of Four Genetic Groups on Two Rearing Systems under Tropical Conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 50(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064700412331312301Aman, G. et al. (2017). Management Practices and Productive Performances of Sasso Chickens Breed under Village Production System in SNNPR, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 7(7). https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JBAH/article/view/36482Alexandratos, N. et al. (2006). World agriculture: towards 2030/2050. Interim report. Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups. Global Perspective Studies Unit. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/esag/docs/Interim_report_AT2050web.pdfAlexandratos, N. and Bruinsma, J. (2012). WORLD AGRICULTURE TOWARDS 2030/2050. The 2012 Revision. (ESA Working paper No. 12-03). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/ap106e/ap106e.pdfBamidele, O. et al. (2019a, July 29-August 2). On-station performance evaluation of improved tropically adapted chicken strains for smallholder poultry production systems in sub- Saharan Africa. [Conference presentation paper]. Seventh All Africa conference on Animal Agriculture, Accra, Ghana. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106379Bamidele, O. et al. (2019b). On-station performance evaluation of improved tropically adapted chicken breeds for smallholder poultry production systems in Nigeria. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52, 1541-1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02158-9Bekele, F. et al. (2009). Genotype X environment interaction in two breeds of chickens kept under two management systems in Southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41(7), 1101-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9290-7Besbes, B. (2009). Genotype evaluation and breeding of poultry for performance under sub-optimal village conditions. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 65(2), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933909000221 Bettridge, J.M. et al. (2018). The role of local adaptation in sustainable production of village chickens. Nature Sustainability, 1, 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0150-9Calus, M.P.L. et al. (2004). Effects of data structure on the estimation of covariance functions to describe genotype by environment interactions in a reaction norm model. Genetics Selection Evolution, 36, 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-36-5-489Dana, N. et al. (2011). Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for body weights and egg production in Horro chicken of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9649-4Dana, N. et al. (2010). Production objectives and trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia: implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing indigenous chicken genetic resources. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42(7), 1519-1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9602-6de Putter, H. et al. (2012). Scoping study of horticulture smallholder production in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. (Report No. 495). Wageningen, Foundation Stichting Dienst Landbouwkundig Onderzoek (DLO) research institute Plant Research International. https://edepot.wur.nl/249787Esatu, W. and Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research. (2016, March 22-23). Highlights of the results of the ACGG baseline survey in Ethiopia. [Conference presentation]. ACGG Ethiopia Second National Innovation Platform Meeting, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132682919.pdfEsatu, W. et al. (2011). Experiences in Hybrid Chicken Scaling up in East and Central Shewa. (Research Report No. 91). Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research.Falconer, D.S. (1952). The problem of environment and selection. The American Naturalist, 86, 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1086/281736Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4. ed. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (2018). Retrieved April 9, 2020 from http://www.ethiopia.gov.et/regional-states1Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). Decision Tools for Family Poultry Development. (FAO Publication No. 16). FAO Animal Production and Health. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3542e.pdfGetachew, F. et al. (2016). Preliminary information on chicken strains to be tested in Ethiopia. African Chicken Genetics Gains. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132683011.pdfGetachew, F. et al. (2019, August 29-31). Unleashing the Power of Data in Transforming Livestock Agriculture in Ethiopia. [Conference presentation paper]. 27th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, EIAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105816Goromela, E.H. et al. (2019, July 29-August 2). Understanding the Entry Points for Improving the Smallholder Chicken Production in Sub-Saharan Africa. [Conference presentation paper]. Seventh All Africa conference on Animal Agriculture, Accra, Ghana. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/106378Hartman, W. (1990). Implications of genotype-environment interactions in animal breeding: genotype-location interactions in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 46, 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19900020Hayes, B.J. et al. (2016). Models for Genome X Environment Interaction: Examples in Livestock. Crop Science, 56, 2251-2259. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.07.0451Ibrahim, D. et al. (2019). Dual-purpose production of genetically different chicken crossbreeds in Ethiopia. 1. Parent stocks’ feed intake, body weight, and reproductive performance. Poultry Science, 98(8), 3119-3129. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez136International Livestock Research Institute. (2018). ILRI Project Profile. African Chicken Genetic Gains.Kassie, G.T. et al. (2007). Cattle Trait Preferences in the Semi-subsistence Livestock Production Systems of Central Ethiopia. In Kassie, G.T. (ed.) Economic Valuation of the Preferred Traits of Indigenous Cattle in Ethiopia. [Doctoral dissertation, Agrar- und Ernährungswissenschaftliche Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel]. Multimedia archive and publication server of Kiel University. https://macau.uni-kiel.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dissertation_derivate_00002370/Kassie,_Girma_-_PhD_Thesis_pubslished.pdf (pp. 31-48).Lozano-Jaramillo, M. (2019). Predicting breed by environment interaction using ecological modelling. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Wageningen University.Lozano-Jaramillo, M. et al. (2019). Using phenotypic distribution models to predict livestock performance. Nature. Scientific Reports, 9, 15371 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51910-6Lwelamira, J. (2012). Genotype-Environmental (GxE) interaction for Body Weights for Kuchi Chicken Ecotype of Tanzania Reared On-Station and On-Farm. International Journal of Poultry Science, 11(2), 96-102. https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2012.96.102Mohammed, C. et al. (2017). Prevalence of Ovine Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Haromaya District Eastern Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Eastern Ethiopia. Archives on Veterinary Science and Technology, 2, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.29011/2637-9988/100006Mueller, J.P. et al. (2015). Community-based livestock breeding programmes: essentials and examples. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 132, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12136Oonincx, D.G.A.B. and de Boer, I.J.M. (2012). Environmental Impact of the Production of Mealworms as a Protein Source for Humans – A Life Cycle Assessment. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e51145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051145Oranu, C.O. et al. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Farmers’ Perception and Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change and Variability in Bako Tibe, Ethiopia and Abeokuta, Nigeria. American Journal of Climate Change, 7, 611-623. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2018.74038Oromia Bureau of Finance and Economic Development. (2009). Regional Statistics. The National Regional Government of Oromia. Retrieved April 28, 2020 from https://www.oromiabofed.gov.et/SAS Institute Inc. (2020). Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide. 7. ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Sharma, J. et al. (2015). Higher weight gain by Kuroiler chickens than indigenous chickens raised under scavenging conditions by rural households in Uganda. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 27(9). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/9/shar27178.htmlShiferaw, T. (2008). Socio-ecological Functioning and Economic Performance of Rain-fed farming Systems in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District, Ethiopia. Agroecology Master’s Program Norwegian University of Life Sciences.Sölkner, J. et al. (1998, January 11-16). Analysis of determinants for success and failure of village breeding programmes. [Conference presentation paper]. Proceedings of the 6th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Armidale, Australia.Vernooij, A. et al. (2018). Regionalisation in poultry development in Eastern Africa. Wageningen Livestock Research. Netherlands Africa Business Council.Wakchaure, R. et al. (2016). Genotype X Environment Interaction in Animal Breeding: A Review. In Khan, M.M.A.A. et al. (eds.) Biodiversity Conservation in Changing Climate. Delhi: Lenin Media Private Limited (pp. 60-73).Wondmeneh, E. et al. (2011). Comparative Evaluation of Fertility and Hatchability of Horro, Fayoumi, Lohmann Silver and Potchefstroom Koekoek Breeds of Chicken. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 5, 124-129. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2011.124.129Wondmeneh, E. et al. (2014a, August 17-22). A running breeding program for indigenous chickens in Ethiopia: Evaluation of success. [Conference presentation paper]. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vancouver, Canada. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/78502Wondmeneh, E. et al. (2014b). Adoption of exotic chicken breeds by rural poultry keepers in Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 64(4), 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2015.1005658Wondmeneh, E. et al. (2015). Village poultry production system: Perception of farmers and simulation of impacts of interventions. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(24), 2075-2081. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.10493Wondmeneh, E. et al. (2016). Comparison of different poultry breeds under station and on-farm conditions in Ethiopia. Livestock Science, 183, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.019 
 
Publisher Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica
 
Contributor
 
Date 2020-11-19
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://www.acta.fapz.uniag.sk/journal/index.php/on_line/article/view/703
 
Source Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica; Vol 23 (2020): Future Perspectives in Animal Production
1336-9245
1336-9245
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://www.acta.fapz.uniag.sk/journal/index.php/on_line/article/view/703/pdf
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library