The International Court of Justice in Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan) and a delayed regulatory coupling:

Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The International Court of Justice in Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan) and a delayed regulatory coupling:
La Corte Internacional de Justicia en el asunto Jadhav (India v. Pakistan) y un acople normativo demorado:
O Tribunal Internacional de Justiça no processo Jadhav (Índia v. Paquistão) e um acoplamento normativo demorado:
 
Creator Elena C. Díaz Galán
Harold Bertot Triana
 
Description This article critically analyses the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice in relation to the interpretation and application of article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. This time in the light of the recent decision in the Jadhav case (India v. Pakistan), in which the Court maintains a line of jurisprudence that is analysed in its limitations in relation to human rights and which has antecedents. Theaim is to demonstrate, through a legal and a case-law analysis as an essential method of work, that no decisive progress hasyet been made in the recognition of the right to be informed to consular assistance as a human right with autonomy at the legal level. The International Court of Justice does not draw all the consequences in the field of human rights in this area. This work would have the value of pointing out the lines that should been followed by the Court’s jurisprudence in order to accommodate the tendency to deal with cases related to the human rights.
El presente artículo analiza críticamente la jurisprudencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia en relación con la interpretación y aplicación del artículo 36 de la Convención de Viena sobre Relaciones Consulares. Esta vez al hilo del reciente fallo en el caso Jadhav (India v. Pakistan), en el cual la Corte mantiene una línea jurisprudencialque se analiza en sus limitaciones en relación con los derechos humanos y que tiene antecedentes. Se pretende demostrar, mediante el análisis normativo y jurisprudencial como método esencial del trabajo, que todavía no se han producido avances decisivos en el reconocimiento del derecho a ser informado a la asistencia consultar como un derecho humano que disponga de autonomía en el plano jurídico. La Corte Internacional de Justicia no extrae todas las consecuencias en el campo de los derechos humanos en esta temática. Este trabajo tendría el valor de apuntar las líneas que debería seguir la jurisprudencia de la Corte para acoger la tendencia a ocuparse de los asuntos sobre derechos humanos.
Este artigo analisa criticamente a jurisprudência do Tribunal Internacional de Justiça em relação à interpretação e aplicação do artigo 36º da Convenção de Viena sobre Relações Consulares. Desta vez, segue-se a recente decisão no processo Jadhav (Índia contra Paquistão), no qual o Tribunal mantém uma linha de jurisprudência que é analisada nas suas limitações em relação aos direitos humanos, e que tem antecedentes.Pretende-se demonstrar, através da análise normativa e jurisprudencial como método essencial do trabalho, que ainda não se registaram progressos decisivos no reconhecimento do direito a ser informado da assistência consultar como um direito humano que disponha de autonomia no plano jurídico. O Tribunal Internacional de Justiça não tira todas as consequências no domínio dos direitos humanos nesta matéria. Este trabalho teria a coragem de apontar as linhas que a jurisprudência do Tribunal deveria seguir para acolher a tendência a ocupar-se dos assuntos sobre direitos humanos.
 
Publisher Facultad de Derecho
 
Date 2020-10-03
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
artículo evaluado por pares
Peer-reviewed Article
Avaliado pelos pares
 
Format application/pdf
text/html
 
Identifier https://revista.fder.edu.uy/index.php/rfd/article/view/764
10.22187/rfd2020n49a16
 
Source Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; No 49 (2020); e20204916
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Núm. 49 (2020); e20204916
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; n. 49 (2020); e20204916
2301-0665
0797-8316
 
Language spa
 
Relation https://revista.fder.edu.uy/index.php/rfd/article/view/764/1365
https://revista.fder.edu.uy/index.php/rfd/article/view/764/1369
/*ref*/Andrés Sáenz de Santamaría, P. (2013). Una nueva contribución a la fijación de la indemnización por hecho internacionalmente ilícito: la Sentencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia de 19 de Junio de 2012 en el asunto Ahmadou Sadio Diallo. En S. Torres Bernárdez (coord.), El derecho internacional en el mundo multipolar del siglo XXI: obra homenaje al profesor Luis Ignacio Sánchez Rodríguez, pp. 203-218.
/*ref*/Bedi, S. (2007). The Development of Human Rights Law by the Judges of the International Court of Justice. Oregon: Oxford-Portland.
/*ref*/Bruno Simma, B. (2012). Human Rights Before the International Court of Justice: Community Interest Coming to Life? En: Holger Hestermeyer [et al.], Coexistence, cooperation and solidarity: liber amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 577-604.
/*ref*/Cançado Trindade,A. A. (2013). El difícil camino del acceso de la persona humana a la justicia en el contencioso interestatal ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia. AHLADI, (21), 173-213.
/*ref*/Cançado Trindade. A. A. (2003). International Law for Humankind Towards a New Jus Gentium. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
/*ref*/Crawford, J., y Keene, A. (2019). Interpretation of the human rights treaties by the International Court of Justice. The International Journal of Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1600509
/*ref*/Deen-Racsmány, Z. (2002). Diplomatic Protection and the LaGrand Case. Leiden Journal of International Law, (15), 87-103.
/*ref*/Díaz Barrado, C. M. (2004). El Derecho Internacional del Tiempo Presente. Madrid: Dykinson.
/*ref*/Dubey, A. (2017). The Jadhav Case Before the International Court of Justice. Indian Journal of International Law, 57, 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-017-0067-2
/*ref*/Giorgetti, C. (2008). Introductory note to international court of Justice: Request for Interpretation of the Judgment in the case concerning Avena and other Mexican nationals. International Legal Materials, 5(47), 723-725.
/*ref*/Higgins, R. (2007). Human Rights in the International Court of Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law, (20), 745–751.
/*ref*/Jenning, R. (2002). The Lagrand Case. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (1), 13–54.
/*ref*/Kammerhofer, J. (2003). The Binding Nature of Provisional Measures of the International Court of Justice: the ‘Settlement’ of the Issue in the LaGrand Case. Leiden Journal of International Law, (16), 67-83.
/*ref*/Mennecke, M., y Tams, C. J. (2002). Lagrand Case (Germany v United States of America). The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2(51), 449-455.
/*ref*/Meron, T. (2006). The Humanization of International Law, General Courseon Public International Law, Hague Academy of International Law. Martinus Leiden-Boston, Nijhoff Publishers.
/*ref*/Orakhelashvili, A. (2002). Questions of International Judicial Jurisdiction in the LaGrand Case. Leiden Journal of International Law, (15), 105-130.
/*ref*/Orakhelashvili, A. (2005). Judicial Competence and Judicial Remedies in the Avena Case. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18, 31-48.
/*ref*/Pastor Palomar, A. (2010). La protección diplomática mediante la Corte Internacional de Justicia a favor del Sr. Diallo, empresario de la República de Guinea en la República Democrática del Congo. Sentencia de la CIJ de 24 de mayo de 2007. Asunto “Ahmadou Sadio Diallo” (República de Guinea c. República Democrática del Congo). En: L. I. Sánchez Rodríguez [et. al], El poder de los jueces y el estado actual del derecho internacional: análisis crítico de la jurisprudencia internacional (2000-2007), pp. 589- 604.
/*ref*/Petit De Gabriel, E.W., (2017). Los “derechos consulares” de los extranjeros detenidos: ¿Nuevas cartas en la baraja de los derechos fundamentales? Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 33. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.33.07
/*ref*/Polak, M. J. (2017). The Jadhav case and the right to consular assistance: ‘confessions’ , spies, and remedies in international law. Indian Journal of International Law, 57, 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-018-0077-8
/*ref*/Pulkowski, D. (2006). Testing Compliance Theories: Towards US Obedience of International Law in the Avena Case. Leiden Journal of International Law, (19), 511-554.
/*ref*/Shelton, D. L. (2004). Case concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States). The American Journal of International Law, (98), 3, 2004, 559-566.
/*ref*/Sreenivasa Rao, P. (2016). The Jadhav case (2017): India and Pakistan before the International Court of Justice. Indian Journal of International Law, 56,379–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-017-0063-6
/*ref*/Villegas Delgado, C. (2020). La Corte Internacional de Justicia y la paulatina humanización del Derecho consular: de Breard a Jadhav. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 39. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.39.04
 
Rights Derechos de autor 2020 Elena C. Díaz Galán y Harold Bertot Triana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library