Genetic parameters for growth and reproduction in Simmental cattle from pedigree and genomic relationship

Revista MVZ Córdoba

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Genetic parameters for growth and reproduction in Simmental cattle from pedigree and genomic relationship
Parámetros genéticos para crecimiento y reproducción en ganado Simmental mediante parentesco por pedigrí y genómico
 
Creator Amaya-Martínez, Adonai Alejandro
Martínez S., Rodrigo
Cerón-Muñoz, Mario Fernando
 
Description Objective. To estimate genetic parameters for weight at eight months of age (W8M), age at first calving (AFC) and first calving interval (FCI) using pedigree and genomic relationship. Materials and methods. Phenotypic data on 481, 3063 and 1098 animals for W8M, AFC and FCI were used, respectively. The genomic information came from a population of 718 genotyped animals with a density chip of 30,106 single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNP). Univariate and bivariate models were used under the conventional (BLUP) and single step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (ssGBLUP) methodologies. Results. The heritabilities for W8M, AFC and FCI ranged from 0.25 to 0.26, from 0.20 to 0.22 and from 0.04 to 0.08, respectively. The AFC and FCI models under ssGBLUP slightly decreased the error and increased the additive genetic variance, respectively. Conclusions. The inclusion of genomic information slightly increases the accuracy of the genetic estimates in this population. However, a larger amount of genotyped animals and with a higher genetic relationship connectivity would allow breeders to increase the potential of the ssGBLUP methodology in Colombian Simmental cattle.
Objetivo. Estimar parámetros genéticos para peso a los ocho meses de edad (W8M), edad al primer parto (AFC) y primer intervalo entre partos (FCI) usando parentesco genómico y por pedigrí. Materiales y métodos. Se utilizaron 481, 3063 y 1098 registros fenotípicos para W8M, AFC y FCI, respectivamente. La información genómica estuvo compuesta por una población de 718 animales genotipados con un chip que incluyó 30106 marcadores genéticos tipo polimorfismo de nucleótido simple (SNP). Modelos univariado y bivariado fueron construidos bajo la metodología del mejor predictor lineal insesgado convencional (BLUP) y genómico en una etapa (ssGBLUP). Resultados. Las heredabilidades para W8M, AFC y FCI variaron desde 0.25 a 0.26, 0.20 a 0.22 y 0.04 a 0.08, respectivamente. Los modelos de AFC y FCI con la metodología ssGBLUP disminuyeron ligeramente el error y aumentaron la varianza genética aditiva, respectivamente. Conclusiones. La inclusión de información genómica mejora levemente la precisión de las estimaciones genéticas en esta población. Sin embargo, una población de animales genotipados más grande y con mayor conectividad genética por parentesco permitiría aumentar para los criadores el potencial de la metodología ssGBLUP en ganado Simmental de Colombia.
 
Publisher Universidad de Córdoba
 
Date 2020-02-07
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
application/pdf
application/zip
application/zip
application/xml
application/xml
 
Identifier https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520
10.21897/rmvz.1520
 
Source Journal MVZ Cordoba; Journal MVZ Córdoba Volume 24 (1) January-April 2020; 1520
Revista MVZ Córdoba; Revista MVZ Córdoba Volumen 25(1) Enero-abril 2020; 1520
1909-0544
10.21897/rmvz.v25i.n1.2020
 
Language spa
eng
 
Relation /*ref*/Rezende F, Ferraz J, Eler J, Silva R, Mattos E, Ibáñez-Escriche N. Study of using marker assisted selection on a beef cattle breeding program by model comparison. Livest Sci. 2012; 147(1-3):40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.017
/*ref*/Ryu J, Lee C. Genomic Heritability of Bovine Growth Using a Mixed Model. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014; 27(11):1521-1525. https://dx.doi.org/10.5713%2Fajas.2014.14287
/*ref*/Chin-Colli R, Estrada-León R, Magaña-Monforte J, Segura-Correa J, Nuñez-Domínguez R. Genetics parameters for growth and reproductive traits of Brown Swiss cattle from Mexico. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios. 2016; 3(7):11–20. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5918056
/*ref*/Vergara O, Elzo M, Cerón-Muñoz M. Genetic parameters and genetic trends for age at first calving and calving interval in an Angus-Blanco Orejinegro-Zebu multibreed cattle population in Colombia. Livest. Sci. 2009; 126(1-3):318-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.07.009
/*ref*/Jenko J, Wiggans G, Cooper T, Eaglen S, Luff W, Bichard M et al. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy 6. cattle population. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(1):439-452. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11479
/*ref*/Muir W. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007; 124(6):342–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x
/*ref*/Loberg A, Dürr J, Fikse W, Jorjani H, Crooks L. Estimates of genetic variance and variance of predicted genetic merits using pedigree or genomic relationship matrices in six Brown Swiss cattle populations for different traits. J Anim Breed Genet. 2015; 132(5):376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12142
/*ref*/Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage. Am J Hum Genetic 2007; 81(3):559-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/519795
/*ref*/Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor T. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93(2):743–752. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2730
/*ref*/Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Lourenco D, Masuda Y, Aguilar I, Legarra A et al. Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs. University of Georgia; Athens, USA; 2018. http://nce.ads.uga.edu/wiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=blupf90_all2.pdf
/*ref*/Montes D, Vergara O, Prieto E, Rodriguez, A. Estimation of genetic parameters to determine the birth and weaning weight in Brahman bovines. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2008; 13(1):1184-1191. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.409
/*ref*/Segura-Correa J, Chin-Colli R, Magaña-Monforte J, Núñez-Domínguez R. Genetic parameters for birth weight, weaning weight and age at first calving in Brown Swiss cattle in Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012; 44(2):337–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0026-8
/*ref*/Cerón-Muñoz M, Tonhati H, Costa C, Maldonado-Estrada J, Rojas-Sarmiento D. Genotype × Environment Interaction for Age at First Calving in Brazilian and Colombian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 2004; 87(8):2455–2458. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73369-X
/*ref*/Brzáková M, Svitáková A, Veselá Z, Cítek J. Genetic parameters for first calving interval in beef cattle. Acta fytotechn Zootechn. 2016; 19(1):22–24. http://www.acta.fapz.uniag.sk/journal/index.php/on_line/article/view/279
/*ref*/Guillen A, Guerra D, Ávila N, Palacios A, Ortega R, Espinoza J. Parámetros y tendencias genéticas del peso al destete y a los 18 meses de edad en ganado Cebú bermejo de Cuba. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu. 2012; 3(1):19-31. https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/1246/1241
/*ref*/Torres-Vásquez J, Spangler M. Genetic parameters for docility, weaning weight, yearling weight, and intramuscular fat percentage in Hereford cattle. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(1):21–27. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9566
/*ref*/Kebede D, Komlosi I. Evaluation of genetic parameters and growth traits of Hungarian Simmental cattle breed. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2015; 27(9). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/9/dami27172.html
/*ref*/Marques L, Koetz C, Mozaquatro V, Favaro M, Jardim J, Azambuja E. Genetic parameters of age at first calving, weight gain, and visual scores in Nelore heifers. R Bras Zootec. 2017; 46(4):303-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000400005
/*ref*/Ayalew W, Aliy M, Negussie E. Estimation of genetic parameters of the productive and reproductive traits in Ethiopian Holstein using multi-trait models. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017; 30(11):1550–1556. http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0198
/*ref*/Torshizi E. Effects of season and age at first calving on genetic and phenotypic characteristics of lactation curve parameters in Holstein cows. J Anim Sci Technol. 2016; 58(8). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs40781-016-0089-1
/*ref*/Rocha J, Gallego J, Vásquez R, Pedraza J, Echeverri J, Cerón-Muñoz M et al. Estimation of genetic parameters for age at first calving and calving interval in Blanco Orejinegro (BON) breed cattle populations in Colombia. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 2012; 25(2):220–228. http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/rccp/article/view/324749
/*ref*/Gutiérrez J, Alvarez I, Fernández I, Royo L, Díez J, Goyache F. Genetic relationships between calving date, calving interval, age at first calving and type traits in beef cattle. Livest Prod Sci. 2002; 78(3):215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00100-8
/*ref*/Buzanskas M, Pires P, Chud T, Bernardes P, Rola L, Savegnago R et al. Parameter estimates for reproductive and carcass traits in Nelore beef cattle. Theriogenology. 2017; 92(1):204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.057
/*ref*/Haile-Mariam M, Nieuwhof G, Beard K, Konstatinov K, Hayes B. Comparison of heritabilities of dairy traits in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle from genomic and pedigree data and implications for genomic evaluations. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013; 130(1):20-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2013.01001.x
/*ref*/Mostert B, Westhuizen R, Theron H. Calving interval genetic parameters and trends for dairy breeds in South Africa. S Afr J Anim Sci. 2010; 40(2):156-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v40i2.57288
/*ref*/Haile-Mariam M, Price J. Variances and correlations of milk production, fertility, longevity, and type traits over time in Australian Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98(10):7364-7379. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9537
/*ref*/Guo G, Zhao F, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Du L, Su G. Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models. BMC Genet. 2014; 15(30). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-30
/*ref*/Christensen O, Lund M. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet Sel Evol. 2010; 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-42-2
/*ref*/Hutchison J, VanRaden P, Null D, Cole J, Bickhart D. Genomic evaluation of age at first calving. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(8):6853-6861. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12060
/*ref*/Heise J, Stock K, Reinhardt F, Ha N, Simianer H. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between age at first calving, its component traits, and survival of heifers up to second calving. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101(1):425-432. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12957
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520/2377
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520/2378
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520/2425
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520/2426
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520/2427
https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e1520/2428
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library