Clinical effect of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Reports in Clinical Studies and Medicine
View Publication Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
Clinical effect of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy
|
|
| Creator |
Yanzhou, Jiang
Lianchong, Fu Yushan, Mu |
|
| Subject |
Anterior and posterior surgery combined therapy; Spinal cord type of cervical spondylosis; Clinical efficacy; Spinal nerve function
|
|
| Description |
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined anterior and posterior approach surgery for patients with spinal type. Methods: 96 patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly selected among all patients admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015. They were evenly assigned to A, B or C group, 32 patients each. Patients in Group A suffered from cervical myelopathy and were treated by combined anterior and posterior approach. Patients in Group B group suffered from cervical vertebra disease and accepted a cervical corpectomy decompression and a bone graft fusion internal fixation surgery. Patients in Group C accepted conventional posterior decompression and fusion surgery for lateral mass screw fixation. Postoperative follow-up, X-ray intervertebral stability and fusion, neurological function JOA score and clinical efficacy of the effective date were compared. Results: JOA scores of all three groups were improved after 6 months. After a year, patients in Group A, B and C scored (16.3 ± 1.83), (15.7 ± 1.15) and (15.59 ± 1.21), respectively. The pairwise score differences between any two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). After one year’s follow-up, the bone graft and internal fixation material had no signs of loosening, displacement or subsidence. The fusion rates of Group A, B and C reached 90.6%, 53.1% and 56.25%, respectively. Similarly, the pairwise differences in fusion rate between any two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The clinical effectiveness was classified as apparent, effective, fair and invalid. The effective rates of Group A, B and C were 87.5%, 50% and 56.2%, respectively. The pairwise differences between any two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Combined anterior and posterior approach surgery significantly improved the clinical efficacy than the other two surgeries.
|
|
| Publisher |
PiscoMed Publishing Pte Ltd
|
|
| Contributor |
—
|
|
| Date |
2018-12-27
|
|
| Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
http://ojs.piscomed.com/index.php/rcsm/article/view/55
10.18282/rcsm.v1.i1.55 |
|
| Source |
Reports in Clinical Studies and Medicine; Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Published; 7-10
2661-4006 |
|
| Language |
eng
|
|
| Relation |
http://ojs.piscomed.com/index.php/rcsm/article/view/55/67
|
|
| Rights |
Copyright (c) 2019 Jiang Yanzhou et al.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
|
