Comparing the Camry dynamometer to the Jamar dynamometer for use in healthy Colombian adults

Revista Salud Bosque

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Comparing the Camry dynamometer to the Jamar dynamometer for use in healthy Colombian adults
Comparación del dinamómetro Camry con el dinamómetro Jamar para su uso en adultos colombianos saludables
 
Creator Díaz Muñoz, Gustavo Alfonso
Calvera Millán, Sandra Julieth
 
Subject fuerza de la mano, extremidad superior, dinamómetro de fuerza muscular, estudio transversal, bioestadística.
 
Description Objective: Hand grip strength can provide an objective index of general upper strength, but hand dynamometer has not been validated for use in Colombia. The objective was to determine the interchangeability between Camry electronic and Jamar hydraulic hand grip dynamometers in a population found on the campus of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and the elderly living in a community.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional concordance study on 18-88-year-old males and females. Data regarding their demographics, health, and anthropometric variables were collected/measured and the Lin concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) along with Bland-Altman plots were used for evaluating concordance regarding both devices.
Results: One hundred and thirty-three subjects participated in this study (average age 47±20.74 years-old). Right hand (RH) grip strength was 32.15 ± 9.96 kg with the Jamar dynamometer and 29.95 ± 9.18 kg with the Camry device. It is worth highlighting that the Jamar instrument presents higher values than the Camry instrument (p <0.05). CCC was only significant at the population level and for the 40-59-year-old age group. Bland-Altman plots had narrow limits of agreement.
Conclusion: We concluded that the Camry dynamometer could replace the Jamar dynamometer in the 40-59-year-old age group; furthermore, it would be appropriate for medical use in patient monitoring or follow-up due to the close values observed.
Objetivo. La fuerza de agarre de la mano puede proporcionar un índice objetivo de la fuerza de los miembros superiores, pero no se dispone de un dinamómetro de mano validado para su uso en Colombia. El objetivo fue determinar la intercambiabilidad entre los dinamómetros hidráulicos Jamar y el dinamómetro electrónico Camry en una población que se encuentra en el campus de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia y personas mayores que viven en una comunidad.
Métodos. Estudio transversal de concordancia realizado en hombres y mujeres de 18 a 88 años de edad. Se recolectó información sobre variables demográficas, de salud y antropométricas. El coeficiente de correlación de concordancia de Lin (CCC) y los gráficos de Bland-Altman se utilizaron para evaluar la concordancia entre ambos dispositivos.
Resultados. Participaron 133 sujetos (edad promedio de 47 ± 20,74 años). La fuerza de agarre de la mano derecha fue de 32,15 ± 9,96 kg con el dinamómetro Jamar y de 29,95 ± 9,18 kg con el dispositivo Camry, destacando que el equipo Jamar presenta valores superiores al Jamar (p<0.05). La CCC solo fue significativa a nivel de la población y para el grupo de edad de 40 a 59 años. Los gráficos Bland-Altman presentaron límites de acuerdo estrechos.
Conclusión. Concluimos que el dinamómetro Camry podría reemplazar el dinamómetro Jamar en el grupo de edad de 40-59 años; además, sería apropiado para uso médico en el monitoreo o seguimiento de pacientes debido a los valores cercanos observados.
 
Publisher Universidad El Bosque
 
Date 2019-12-08
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://revistasaludbosque.unbosque.edu.co/article/view/2794
10.18270/rsb.v9i2.2794
 
Source Revista Salud Bosque; Vol 9 No 2 (2019): Volumen 9. Número 2. Año 2019; 21-29
Revista Salud Bosque; ##issue.vol## 9 ##issue.no## 2 (2019): Volumen 9. Número 2. Año 2019; 21-29
Revista Salud Bosque; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2019): Volumen 9. Número 2. Año 2019; 21-29
2322-9462
2248-5759
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://revistasaludbosque.unbosque.edu.co/article/view/2794/2239
/*ref*/Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 2011:40(4):423-9.
/*ref*/Mafi P, Mafi R, Hindocha S, Griffin M, Khan W. A systematic review of dynamometry and its role in hand trauma assessment. Open Orthop J 2012:6(1):95-102.
/*ref*/Ploegmakers JJW, Hepping AM, Geertzen JHB, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. Grip strength is strongly associated with height, weight and gender in childhood: a cross sectional study of 2241 children and adolescents providing reference values. J Physiother 2013:9(4):255-61.
/*ref*/Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PloS one 2014 4 december;9(12):e113637.
/*ref*/Bohannon RW. Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci 2019;31(1):75-8.
/*ref*/Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Bear-Lehman J, Yu T. A test case: does the availability of visual feedback impact grip strength scores when using a digital dynamometer? J Hand Ther 2011;24(3):266-76.
/*ref*/Lawrence I-Kuei Lin. Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 1992;48(2):599-604.
/*ref*/Amaral JF, Mancini M, Novo Júnior JM. Comparison of three hand dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of the measurements. Braz J Phys Ther. 2012;16(3):216-24.
/*ref*/Coldham F, Lewis J, Lee H. The reliability of one vs. three grip trials in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. J Hand Ther 2006;19(3):318-27.
/*ref*/Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9(2):222-6.
/*ref*/Tsai M. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient via variance components, generalized estimating equations and weighted approaches with model selection. Comput Stat Data Anal 2015;82(1):47-58.
/*ref*/Mathiowetz V. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int 2002;9(3):201-9.
/*ref*/Vermeulen J, Neyens JCL, Spreeuwenberg MD, van Rossum E, Hewson DJ, de Witte LP. Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the jamar dynamometer. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2015;38(3):148-53.
/*ref*/Silva SM, Corrêa FI, Silva PFC, Silva DFT, Lucareli PRG, Corrêa JCF. Validation and reliability of a modified sphygmomanometer for the assessment of handgrip strength in Parkinson’s disease. Braz J Phys Ther 2015;19(2):137-45.
/*ref*/Kim M, Shinkai S. Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017;17(11):2089-95.
/*ref*/Dodds R, Syddall H, Cooper R, Kuh D, Cooper C, Sayer A. Global variation in grip strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of normative data. Age Ageing 2016;45(2):209-16.
/*ref*/Hogrel J. Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16(1):139-49.
/*ref*/Massy-Westropp N, Rankin W, Ahern M, Krishnan J, HearnTC. Measuring grip strength in normal adults: reference ranges and a comparison of electronic and hydraulic instruments. J Hand Surg Am 2004;29(3):514-19.
 
Rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library