Inertial reproduction: is the two-child psychology the rule in Costa Rica?

Revista de Ciencias Económicas

View Publication Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Inertial reproduction: is the two-child psychology the rule in Costa Rica?
Reproducción inercial: ¿es la psicología de dos descendientes la regla en Costa Rica?
 
Creator Blanco, Laura Cristina
 
Subject REPRODUCTION
PREFERENCE FOR CHILDREN
DEMAND FOR CHILDREN
GENDER
CONTRACEPTIVE KNOWLEDGE
COSTA RICA
REPRODUCCIÓN
PREFERENCIAS REPRODUCTIVAS
DEMANDA REPRODUCTIVA
GÉNERO
CONOCIMIENTO ANTICONCEPTIVO
COSTA RICA
 
Description This paper uses data from National Surveys on Sexual and Reproductive Health to test whether variables related to identity, sexuality and contraceptive knowledge are associated with the preference and demand for children in Costa Rica.  Both the preferred and actual number of children are estimated with a double hurdle model.  The findings indicate that preferences for children seem to be quite fixed around two children and are mainly associated with religious beliefs and the person’s gender, but they are not found to be associated with human capital.  In contrast, the probability of having a child and the number of children are related to investment in human capital and sex education.  Hence, human capital might be relevant in bringing a child into the world, but not in the initial preference.
Se utilizan las Encuestas Nacionales de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva para someter a prueba si existe una relación entre la identidad, la sexualidad y el conocimiento de anticonceptivos con las preferencias y la demanda reproductiva en Costa Rica.  Tanto el tamaño preferido de descendencia como el tamaño de descendencia efectivo se estima utilizando un modelo de truncamiento doble.  Los resultados muestran que las preferencias reproductivas son bastante estáticas alrededor de dos descendientes y se encuentran principalmente asociadas a creencias religiosas y el género de la persona, pero no con el capital humano.  En contraste, la probabilidad de tener una hija o un hijo y el tamaño de la descendencia se relacionan con la inversión en capital humano y la educación sexual.  Por tanto, el capital humano es relevante para la decisión de traer a una persona al mundo, pero no para la preferencia inicial.
 
Publisher Universidad de Costa Rica
 
Date 2019-06-24
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
 
Format application/pdf
application/epub+zip
audio/mpeg
 
Identifier https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/economicas/article/view/35874
10.15517/rce.v37i1.35874
 
Source Revista de Ciencias Económicas; Vol 37 No 1 (2019): Revista de Ciencias Económicas: (January - June)
Revista de Ciencias Económicas; Vol. 37 Núm. 1 (2019): Revista de Ciencias Económicas: (enero - junio)
2215-3489
0252-9521
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/economicas/article/view/35874/38801
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/economicas/article/view/35874/38802
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/economicas/article/view/35874/38645
/*ref*/Ahmed, S., Li, Q., Liu, L., & Tsui, A. O. (2012). Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: an analysis of 172 countries. The Lancet, 380(9837), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60478-4
/*ref*/Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2009–2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006
/*ref*/Bagozzi, R. P., & Van Loo, M. F. (1978). Fertility as Consumption: Theories from the Behavioral Sciences. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 199–228. https://doi.org/10.1086/208700
/*ref*/Bailey, M. J. (2006). More Power to the Pill: The Impact of Contraceptive Freedom on Women’s Life Cycle Labor Supply. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.1.289
/*ref*/De Beauvoir, S. (1999). El segundo sexo. Madrid: Cátedra. Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries (pp. 209–240). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/chapters/c2387
/*ref*/Becker, G. S. (1991). The demand for children. In A treatise on the family (pp. 135–154). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
/*ref*/Becker, G. S. (1992). Fertility and the economy. Journal of Population Economics, 5(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172092
/*ref*/Bousmah, M.-Q. (2017). The effect of child mortality on fertility behaviors is non-linear: new evidence from Senegal. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-014-9264-7
/*ref*/Broussard, N. H., Chami, R., & Hess, G. D. (2015). (Why) Do self-employed parents have more children? Review of Economics of the Household, 13(2), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9190-0
/*ref*/Bukowski, M., & Rosero-Bixby, L. (1999). La Costa Rica sin padres: el reconocimiento de la paternidad y la pensión alimentaria. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from https://ccp.ucr.ac.cr/ seminario/manuscr.htm
/*ref*/Carey, A. D., & Lopreato, J. (1995). The Evolutionary Demography of the Fertility-Mortality QuasiEquilibrium. Population and Development Review, 21(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137752
/*ref*/Centro Centroamericano de Población. (2010). Encuesta Nacional de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from http://encuestas.ccp.ucr.ac.cr/camerica/enssr2010.html
/*ref*/Centro Centroamericano de Población. (2015). II Encuesta Nacional de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva. Retrieved January 11, 2019, from http://encuestas.ccp.ucr.ac.cr/camerica/enssr2010.html
/*ref*/Cicowiez, M., Saborío, G., & Sánchez, M. V. (2016). Matriz de contabilidad social de Costa Rica 2012: Fundamentos metodológicos de su construcción. San José: Banco Central de Costa Rica.
/*ref*/Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2002). Well-being in panels. DELTA, Mimeo, 1.
/*ref*/De Tray, D. N. (1974). Child quality and the demand for children. In T. W. Schltz (Ed.), The economics of the family: marriage, children and human capital (pp. 91–119). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/chapters/c2964
/*ref*/Di Tella, R. D., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The Macroeconomics of Happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815745
/*ref*/Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001
/*ref*/Frenette, M. (2011). Why do larger families reduce parental investments in child quality, but not child quality per se? Review of Economics of the Household, 9(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-010-9115-0
/*ref*/Friedan, B. (2010). The feminine mystique. London: Penguin Classics.
/*ref*/Ganaba, R., Marshall, T., Sombié, I., Baggaley, R. F., Ouédraogo, T. W., & Filippi, V. (2010). Women’s sexual health and contraceptive needs after a severe obstetric complication (“near-miss”): a cohort study in Burkina Faso. Reproductive Health, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-22
/*ref*/Glenn, N. D., & McLanahan, S. (1981). The Effects of Offspring on the Psychological Well-Being of Older Adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43(2), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/351391
/*ref*/Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2002). The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women’s Career and Marriage Decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 730–770. https://doi.org/10.1086/340778
/*ref*/Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., & Testa, M. R. (2003). The emergence of Sub-Replacement Family Size Ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5/6), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a
/*ref*/Grossbard, S., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2013). Children, spousal love, and happiness: an economic analysis. Review of Economics of the Household, 11(3), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9200-2
/*ref*/Hazan, M., & Zoabi, H. (2015, December 11). Highly educated women no longer have fewer kids. Retrieved December 13, 2015, from VoxEU.org website: https://voxeu.org/article/highly-educated-women-no-longer-have-fewer-kids
/*ref*/Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos [INEC]. (n.d.). Nacimientos. Primer semestre 2017. Características de la madre, del padre y de la persona recién nacida. Datos Preliminares. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from http://www.inec.go.cr/poblacion/nacimientos
/*ref*/Jiménez-Fontana, P. (2015). Analysis of non-remunerated production in Costa Rica. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 5, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2014.09.004
/*ref*/Kalwij, A. S. (2000). The effects of female employment status on the presence and number of children. Journal of Population Economics, 13(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050135
/*ref*/Kasy, M., & Ramos-Chaves, A. (2014). The Impact of Changing Family Structures on the Income Distribution among Costa Rican Women 1993–2009. Feminist Economics, 20(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.862343
/*ref*/Kennedy, E., Gray, N., Azzopardi, P., & Creati, M. (2011). Adolescent fertility and family planning in East Asia and the Pacific: a review of DHS reports. Reproductive Health, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-8-11
/*ref*/Klepinger, D., Lundberg, S., & Plotnick, R. (1999). How Does Adolescent Fertility Affect the Human Capital and Wages of Young Women? The Journal of Human Resources, 34(3), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/146375
/*ref*/Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Skytthe, A. (2005). Partner + Children = Happiness? The Effects of Partnerships and Fertility on Well-Being. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 407– 445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00078.x
/*ref*/Llovet, J. J. (1989). Relación entre fecundidad e ingresos: revisión de algunas interpretaciones. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 4(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v4i1.706 Lopreato, J., & Yu, M. (1988). Human fertility and fitness optimization. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(88)90009-X
/*ref*/Lundholm, M., & Ohlsson, H. (2002). Who takes care of the children? The quantity-quality model revisited. Journal of Population Economics, 15(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480100071
/*ref*/Malarcher, S., Meirik, O., Lebetkin, E., Shah, I., Spieler, J., & Stanback, J. (2011). Provision of DMPA by community health workers: what the evidence shows. Contraception, 83(6), 495–503.
/*ref*/McDonald, P. (2002). Sustaining Fertility through Public Policy: The Range of Options. Population, 57(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.3917/popu.203.0423
/*ref*/McQuillan, K. (2004). When Does Religion Influence Fertility? Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00002.x
/*ref*/Mekonnen, W., & Worku, A. (2011). Determinants of low family planning use and high unmet need in Butajira District, South Central Ethiopia. Reproductive Health, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-8-37
/*ref*/Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/books/minc74-1
/*ref*/Mörk, E., Sjögren, A., & Svaleryd, H. (2013). Childcare costs and the demand for children—evidence from a nationwide reform. Journal of Population Economics, 26(1), 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-011-0399-z
/*ref*/Myrskylä, M., & Margolis, R. (2014). Happiness - before and after the Kids (No. 642). DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
/*ref*/Neels, K., Murphy, M., Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2017). Rising Educational Participation and the Trend to Later Childbearing: Rising Educational Participation and Later Childbearing. Population and Development Review, 43(4), 667–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12112
/*ref*/Potter, J. E. (1988). Birth Spacing and Child Survival: A Cautionary Note Regarding the Evidence from the WFS. Population Studies, 42(3), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000143576
/*ref*/Prata, N. (2009). Making family planning accessible in resource-poor settings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1532), 3093–3099. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0172
/*ref*/Preston, S. H. (1978). Introduction. In S. H. Preston (Ed.), The Effects of infant and child mortality on fertility (pp. 1–18). New York: Academic Press.
/*ref*/Quirós Rojas, I. (2012). Algunas consideraciones sobre los derechos sexuales y reproductivos. In Ministerio de Salud (Ed.), Visualizando la salud reproductiva y la sexualidad desde diversas perspectivas: un análisis a partir de la Encuesta de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva (pp. 137– 146). San José: Ministerio de Salud.
/*ref*/Robles, A., & González, A. (2012a). La fecundidad en Costa Rica: 1992-2010. In Ministerio de Salud (Ed.), Visualizando la salud reproductiva y la sexualidad desde diversas perspectivas: un análisis a partir de la Encuesta de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva (pp. 15–30). San José: Ministerio de Salud.
/*ref*/Robles, A., & González, A. (2012b). Planificación familiar. In Ministerio de Salud (Ed.), Visualizando la salud reproductiva y la sexualidad desde diversas perspectivas: un análisis a partir de la Encuesta de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva (pp. 31–48). San José: Ministerio de Salud.
/*ref*/Rosero-Bixby, L. (1998). Child mortality and the fertility transition: aggregated and multilevel evidence from Costa Rica. In M. Montgomery (Ed.), From Death to Birth: Mortality Decline and Reproductive Change (pp. 384–410). https://doi.org/10.17226/5842
/*ref*/Rosero-Bixby, L., & Oberle, M. W. (1989). Fertility change in Costa Rica 1960-84: analysis of retrospective lifetime reproductive histories. Journal Biosocial Science, 21(4), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000018150
/*ref*/Rosero Bixby, L., & Casterline, J. B. (1995). Difusión por interacción y transición de la fecundidad: evidencia cuantitativa y cualitativa de Costa Rica. 29–78.
/*ref*/Schultz, T. P. (1997). Chapter 8 Demand for children in low income countries. In Handbook of Population and Family Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 349–430). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-003X(97)80025-6
/*ref*/Schultz, T. W. (Ed.). (1974). Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/books/schu74-1
/*ref*/The DHS Program. (2018). The DHS Program - DHS Questionnaires. Retrieved January 31, 2019, from https://dhsprogram.com/what-we-do/survey-types/dhs-questionnaires.cfm
/*ref*/Turchi, B. A. (1975). Microeconomic Theories of Fertility: A Critique. Social Forces, 54(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2576080
/*ref*/Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2003). Parenthood and Marital Satisfaction: A MetaAnalytic Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x
/*ref*/van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3
/*ref*/Yeakey, M. P., Muntifering, C. J., Ramachandran, D. V., Myint, Y., Creanga, A. A., & Tsui, A. O. (2009). How Contraceptive Use Affects Birth Intervals: Results of a Literature Review. Studies in Family Planning, 40(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00203.x
 
Rights Derechos de autor 2019 Revista de Ciencias Económicas
 

Contact Us

The PKP Index is an initiative of the Public Knowledge Project.

For PKP Publishing Services please use the PKP|PS contact form.

For support with PKP software we encourage users to consult our wiki for documentation and search our support forums.

For any other correspondence feel free to contact us using the PKP contact form.

Find Us

Twitter

Copyright © 2015-2018 Simon Fraser University Library